X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=yq+Q9OMvU9Nyudb/6qIO31D/QZ2OOuwayF2T4K0W/uw=; b=JEGOE2XtUhhfuSV+JR+d1i4lwtkCXq0ZZaJpHM2jnDQMdAJsEo80OgUemxzhaPB5Sb BFtFNhKWvM18Le1htzQcYgYa6wSOfpqpT5GuMctEwYnXhFsnVAKG4NLZBCT6b/UdnXxE g6RDUT4hk/s7atT9TPHbyTJmPj0ZUu3xXR9gn94pv4IvF3mcI2Hd/31nYREsSDvfRPkk dCOdPlHoXPQ0BMwpooS5A6V826J/DKylufs1AwcU4RK7LZ7ZOh1PHK6W7uZyQ8Y4+8LC w9PkPdccOO3qRW0KzcKmyuLz9gzE+c/y1E1m60myG8SHtqmrOj/EBVqee2KRzMLgqbn0 zN2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yq+Q9OMvU9Nyudb/6qIO31D/QZ2OOuwayF2T4K0W/uw=; b=DWJ8i4AdH0hSPdBh34gFomHdZtYGVkinXXpoloT9E+1Yf63qdGUH3NpGDrzLHyoFmw iBXCb63yF2uiuq8xc/BpVCN+RMUv+RiS9t9ghv64nclBZTq2QLllucuZADVDWnEmo9IV 70xiFdh40eYikJMfA0qgOeYuuYr/vviAapH5M16URBHbDZ6pZOhsbX2NbAjG2dl+VwGx gZ8YGumFlcRA0JmhhXvmrN60xkglSe9EUbiUQQdgB9SBXMQV6hIwvIG4bQ1G112zqYr8 s2ESKU2tWCfYAPtrjyClhtTHkDa2WBHIhhmolF/RGTZ4ouTau80yHNKZBQtDIdIyoV8R g2fw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWhBmHTUKddkifQkRqZv7QvK1etOlQ+1oSJTQUZvVCu0SVDCIXD97QwzrN3v0Qv860FvZgMfiz3lFJwjOiJk6m0e/Yzw== X-Received: by 10.25.146.193 with SMTP id u184mr16479509lfd.86.1453397686586; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:34:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:34:44 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user] Project leadership Message-ID: <20160121173444.GC4788@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com> <1451827349 DOT 7723 DOT 31 DOT camel AT oscopy DOT org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1451827349.7723.31.camel@oscopy.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Hi Arnaud, On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 02:22:29PM +0100, Arnaud Gardelein wrote: ... > Speaking of Windows, note that on cygwin32 I achieved to use geda-gaf > since Guile 1.8 was packaged. > Those days at work I'm trying to compile geda-gaf (latest and 1.8.2) > under Windows platform, cygwin64 environment. For latest geda-gaf the > problem is that Guile 2.1 is available only from source, not cygwin- > packaged. I tried to compile it, and found it a really harsh trip since > when an error occur, I cannot tell whether I misrun configure tool > (very likely), or an issue with cygwin (or bdw-gc for instance), or an > issue of portability of Guile. From your comment I understand this is > an hopeless task ? > For geda-gaf 1.8.2, and it turns out that there is a missing > gtkconfig.h somewhere, and here again I can't say whether I did > something wrong. > I can post a full bug report if of interest and if relevant to do it > here. I built 1.8.2 with guile 2.0 and it compiled better, or with less errors, than 1.9.0 compared with the latter. I haven't published this branch because I think this has no sense since from my point of view nobody would be interested in such an old version these days. Cheers, Vladimir