X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20160120210035.3859.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:00:35 +0100
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Releaseability of gEDA code
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAM2RGhS2bg=Rjuq6oEeOacV7PfUENy_jq7dxag=vWsUbdH6pAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151229155647 DOT GA3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAM2RGhSLND5+JSSj=1cUPUhzkTCK6d7NZ61QL-eViZRccY5LqA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151229175222 DOT GD3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1512311656190 DOT 1475 AT newt> <96A12FC1-E09C-4D63-8346-5A62FDAB4228 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1512311916190 DOT 12724 AT newt> <20160120173024 DOT GB16858 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201601201903 DOT u0KJ3Lx4026878 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201601201903.u0KJ3Lx4026878@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

DJ Delorie wrote:
> Do we want to change how we do development?

For the sake of simplicity I am a strong proponent of having master
be releaseable at all times.

This requires more careful development, I think that's a good thing.

I find it acceptable to introduce some breakage in a random release,
as long as it also gets fixed quickly, and if master is always
releaseable then it's trivial to make a bugfix release.


//Peter