X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=prochac.sk;
	s=default; t=1452813582;
	bh=dDo3q8B7yFDW3K//mM6JZWieG4oDsQzSPjKHoX73/TE=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=NKTITbIEQCsOBGDDkG5B2+ud3+XW2p9TwLT6Ick53skKI5JXYG3bORjk7Xa2TLq74
	 yTlrh21EcUhzRAQWGdzgOp3NFdeFO64Dl30NvaaHuvE7JUzzOX2VbZ7hMVdU9G7mM/
	 v5+RJ/DCCjEqFUjKfRAKZg7zF4SWn0ehP10Qo6ok=
X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett"
Subject: Re: [geda-user] LP1532611 (modular fie formats) fixes
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <CAC4O8c8tTutWKvXFA-nfcmUiUGYbOY1_5171Vf3WDk09Tmx3yw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: "Milan Prochac (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID: <56982D5A.1020706@prochac.sk>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:20:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC4O8c8tTutWKvXFA-nfcmUiUGYbOY1_5171Vf3WDk09Tmx3yw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,
	USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on angua.bastl.sk
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 12. 1. 2016 20:23, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
> I'm working on this branch there are some minor issues.  I'll push 
> fixes to LP1532611_fixes
>

Can you share details about the issues? I guess I can identify the 
culprit and prepare fix faster

It is also important to distinguish between issues with new modular file 
format and existing issues with the PCB.

Thank you
Milan


> Incidentally I like fftemplate.c better than template.c because the 
> latter is too generic and doesn't give any indication what the the 
> template is for, file_format_template.c would bet better