X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20160114225830.20021.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:58:30 +0100 From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb behavior when invoked on invlalid file needs to change Mail-Followup-To: geda-user References: <201601142034 DOT u0EKYFL6001936 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160114205949 DOT 11004 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Erich Heinzle (a1039181 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > not_a_pcb_file.sch > > could simply be saved as > > not_a_pcb_file.sch.unparseable I disagree strongly with this. It is at the very best unexpected, at worst outright dangerous for a software to take any kind of action on input which it does not understand. The hard fail is important to allow humans to fix the problem. //Peter