X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=oDApTlB44PMTN+INIqwMUgkvH25VnWx86ehc3nQIy1Y=;
        b=MvHQ2pnmvK5NYiARq4wDHtJ/3QHXBoIepel1TLJ24t+4VNX6kxW/TRfj8YzFWcgDhd
         E1btw8b/QHQl8d7uqS9oc0daGXXhm2U4o5jXCew3n+On990V+BFvreNvG8ck1pUxwaPz
         jo6GA3kfMz8l22unMpNzater1iC1CmqQ32zPonPzBrnwtK2MXgMOg7IcCXRJLD193CPm
         VI/5RiewG5if47zGSJrL5BvUA+Xn8h24v4u55lPVzAuMKRN5fFlNXNvxHC/Lpy3W9KiW
         8uwgjwyN+R3hmt+4/FHNpSSYtKiT/Rwh3uTrsPENqjKWNZHghZY6ijP97/ct1/4ts3W0
         5raA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.252.76 with SMTP id zq12mr496735obc.16.1452512847485;
 Mon, 11 Jan 2016 03:47:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJXU7q8dz9-EHMLKy-ED=mTQHM230zWYh0PGaoOkA3ZnwjAR8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJXU7q8edycnyhZbZ7+M3q6HA13U4Tr5R9M7KAG59HVpH2+cMg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<56928D6F DOT 6080807 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CE3B7FFB-7C6F-48CB-ADA9-A42D85A3C022 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<5692AFEC DOT 9060807 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20160110213849 DOT 460c7bb14e8f6645138bebd8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<s6nsi25doll DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<20160111080228 DOT GA32662 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<20160111094144 DOT bee82694c414c1cc36b98cf8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<s6nmvscs6ib DOT fsf AT falbala DOT ieap DOT uni-kiel DOT de>
	<CAJXU7q8dz9-EHMLKy-ED=mTQHM230zWYh0PGaoOkA3ZnwjAR8w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:47:27 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJXU7q83Pc5Uny4cKVwiOCAbS=bFiuEJO=uYZKD-tUrmadr27A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Primitive electrical types --> layers
From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134c3764e605c05290d80a0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--001a1134c3764e605c05290d80a0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11 Jan 2016 11:39, "Peter Clifton" <petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com> wrote=
:
>
> On 11 January 2016 at 11:25, Stephan B=C3=B6ttcher (geda AT psjt DOT org) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> I want the Gerber exporter to export exactly what I draw.  And I will
>> draw exactly what the boardhouse wants.  And I don't want the PCB
>> program to complain if it assigns semantics in a different way as the
>> boardhouse.
>
>
> That would not be a problem, especially if you chose not to use the
facilities (soon to be) provided by the tools for doing this in a more
robust way.
>
> In this case, you'd retain a mechanical, or notes layer, which the tool
will not treat specially, or apply semantic meaning to it.
>
>> If somebody insists on 3D models in a PCB layout tool, then there need
>> to be separate drawings for the boardhouse and the 3D model.  And the
>> programm please work well without any of the 3D stuff drawn.
>
>
> Granted, but and I'm rather starting to take offence that you don't seem
to respect I know what I'm doing here.

Also,  being pedantic - it was adding better 2D model data I was taking
about here, not 3D. (But yes, one of my motivations is to give better data
for extruding to construct an exported 3D model of the board).

> Peter

--001a1134c3764e605c05290d80a0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On 11 Jan 2016 11:39, &quot;Peter Clifton&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:peter=
cjclifton AT googlemail DOT com">petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On 11 January 2016 at 11:25, Stephan B=C3=B6ttcher (<a href=3D"mailto:=
geda AT psjt DOT org">geda AT psjt DOT org</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie.=
com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com=
">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; I want the Gerber exporter to export exactly what I draw.=C2=A0 An=
d I will<br>
&gt;&gt; draw exactly what the boardhouse wants.=C2=A0 And I don&#39;t want=
 the PCB<br>
&gt;&gt; program to complain if it assigns semantics in a different way as =
the<br>
&gt;&gt; boardhouse.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; That would not be a problem, especially if you chose not to use the fa=
cilities (soon to be) provided by the tools for doing this in a more robust=
 way.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; In this case, you&#39;d retain a mechanical, or notes layer, which the=
 tool will not treat specially, or apply semantic meaning to it.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; If somebody insists on 3D models in a PCB layout tool, then there =
need<br>
&gt;&gt; to be separate drawings for the boardhouse and the 3D model.=C2=A0=
 And the<br>
&gt;&gt; programm please work well without any of the 3D stuff drawn.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Granted, but and I&#39;m rather starting to take offence that you don&=
#39;t seem to respect I know what I&#39;m doing here.<br></p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Also,=C2=A0 being pedantic - it was adding better 2D model d=
ata I was taking about here, not 3D. (But yes, one of my motivations is to =
give better data for extruding to construct an exported 3D model of the boa=
rd).</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">&gt; Peter<br>
</p>

--001a1134c3764e605c05290d80a0--