X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=s261cA4duHTFORhAZn6U0KsmkM/EVGqYBl5unbNfHWU=;
        b=ByauBaLASm6ENptvlaSLoqIx8TzCwqQI4oGkE1p1caHOD7asQhmdbZV7ijakJI81mS
         vNfx8FHV9GsdjnB2+1dRjfvaBN7WVcLT2B9roYrydP5jitgdYvOi4PcLOSX7KgmC+lua
         mKXzOG/X8OJdkZsUDs2mlAOurKuU3qeBmYCTKVuqXG+DgmzlIEA8LXBRkeRU/t5S3rBh
         oRdkJlsQJkz+w43g8dSYOULzxPKciKxegpaPRNGvLUhLN4+kvd+jAswkownGsm98PQUU
         gpF58PtRtY2IxPkhRtbZ7qHedqXSgDQ+74ArJLeMJe2YyeAcuNVv5QaqcVrE1kOjpuzj
         9vAQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.213.215 with SMTP id m206mr90690757oig.26.1452512346325;
 Mon, 11 Jan 2016 03:39:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <s6nmvscs6ib.fsf@falbala.ieap.uni-kiel.de>
References: <CAJXU7q8edycnyhZbZ7+M3q6HA13U4Tr5R9M7KAG59HVpH2+cMg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<56928D6F DOT 6080807 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CE3B7FFB-7C6F-48CB-ADA9-A42D85A3C022 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<5692AFEC DOT 9060807 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20160110213849 DOT 460c7bb14e8f6645138bebd8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<s6nsi25doll DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<20160111080228 DOT GA32662 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<20160111094144 DOT bee82694c414c1cc36b98cf8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<s6nmvscs6ib DOT fsf AT falbala DOT ieap DOT uni-kiel DOT de>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:39:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJXU7q8dz9-EHMLKy-ED=mTQHM230zWYh0PGaoOkA3ZnwjAR8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Primitive electrical types --> layers
From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113de5686f4cf605290d626d
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--001a113de5686f4cf605290d626d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11 January 2016 at 11:25, Stephan B=C3=B6ttcher (geda AT psjt DOT org) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> I want the Gerber exporter to export exactly what I draw.  And I will
> draw exactly what the boardhouse wants.  And I don't want the PCB
> program to complain if it assigns semantics in a different way as the
> boardhouse.
>

That would not be a problem, especially if you chose not to use the
facilities (soon to be) provided by the tools for doing this in a more
robust way.

In this case, you'd retain a mechanical, or notes layer, which the tool
will not treat specially, or apply semantic meaning to it.

If somebody insists on 3D models in a PCB layout tool, then there need
> to be separate drawings for the boardhouse and the 3D model.  And the
> programm please work well without any of the 3D stuff drawn.
>

Granted, but and I'm rather starting to take offence that you don't seem to
respect I know what I'm doing here.

Peter

--001a113de5686f4cf605290d626d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 1=
1 January 2016 at 11:25, Stephan B=C3=B6ttcher (<a href=3D"mailto:geda AT psjt=
.org">geda AT psjt DOT org</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda=
-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT de=
lorie.com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br=
><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">
</span>I want the Gerber exporter to export exactly what I draw.=C2=A0 And =
I will<br>
draw exactly what the boardhouse wants.=C2=A0 And I don&#39;t want the PCB<=
br>
program to complain if it assigns semantics in a different way as the<br>
boardhouse.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That would not be a problem=
, especially if you chose not to use the facilities (soon to be) provided b=
y the tools for doing this in a more robust way.<br><br>In this case, you&#=
39;d retain a mechanical, or notes layer, which the tool will not treat spe=
cially, or apply semantic meaning to it.<br><br></div><blockquote class=3D"=
gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-=
left:1ex">
If somebody insists on 3D models in a PCB layout tool, then there need<br>
to be separate drawings for the boardhouse and the 3D model.=C2=A0 And the<=
br>
programm please work well without any of the 3D stuff drawn.<span class=3D"=
"><br></span></blockquote><div><br></div>Granted, but and I&#39;m rather st=
arting to take offence that you don&#39;t seem to respect I know what I&#39=
;m doing here.<br><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote">Peter<br></div></div=
></div>

--001a113de5686f4cf605290d626d--