X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 63.119.35.194
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8D4F39A4-87BB-4CE4-BA1B-C3A88C67EF71"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Bus Junction Size
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <569150EE.1030105@iee.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:51:56 -0500
Message-Id: <DFC0BFAD-588C-4656-87F8-0DEAF8CCB2C3@noqsi.com>
References: <B7628CE0-70A1-4E3A-92E1-4E1D6B0B2BE2 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20160109191557 DOT 3ccdc712c17d6ed73f0b7efd AT gmail DOT com> <569150EE DOT 1030105 AT iee DOT org>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_8D4F39A4-87BB-4CE4-BA1B-C3A88C67EF71
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Jan 9, 2016, at 1:26 PM, M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via =
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Agreed, and the code seems to be ambiguous .. ! but then the code =
refers
> to 'mils' which is irrelevant on-screen=85.

Heritage from the ancient inspiration for gEDA, Viewlogic. That, in =
turn, was intended to match the symbol sizes from the templates of the =
Plastic Age.

>=20
> MJE
>=20
> On 09/01/16 18:15, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) =
[via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> I would say junction between blue lines to the left is good but =
junction between green lines to the right is to small.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>> It appears that the bus junction size is incorrect in gschem. Here =
is a screenshot and below is the source code. The bus and net sizes look =
reversed in the source code. If everyone is happy with the net junction =
size, I=92m reluctant to swap them back.
>>>=20
>>> When I print, I scale down and target 17x11, and the nets are a bit =
small on paper.
>>>=20
>>> What are others experience?
>>>=20
>>> Ed
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> /* various visual cue sizes (in mils) */
>>> #define CUE_BOX_SIZE 		30
>>> #define JUNCTION_CUE_SIZE_NET	50
>>> #define JUNCTION_CUE_SIZE_BUS	30
>>> #define PIN_CUE_SIZE_NET	30
>>> #define PIN_CUE_SIZE_BUS	50
>=20
>=20

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_8D4F39A4-87BB-4CE4-BA1B-C3A88C67EF71
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=TSfD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_8D4F39A4-87BB-4CE4-BA1B-C3A88C67EF71--