X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-UW-Orig-Sender: fpm AT homer01 DOT u DOT washington DOT edu Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 08:28:49 -0800 (PST) From: "Frank Miles (fpm AT u DOT washington DOT edu) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user] Project leadership In-Reply-To: <29B50AD8-DCD0-4048-B888-711C5D8E1E65@noqsi.com> Message-ID: References: <8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com> <29B50AD8-DCD0-4048-B888-711C5D8E1E65 AT noqsi DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1217 2009-02-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2493963, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.1.7.161817 X-PMX-Server: mxout24.cac.washington.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_600_699 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, John Doty wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Frank Miles (fpm AT u DOT washington DOT edu) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> I can't use the >> recommended direct PCB gschem-schematic-import method due to some special >> schematic post-processing (mostly eliminating off-board parts/wiring, which I >> want to have on the schematic), > > I attach graphical=1 to those to tell gnetlist that they don?t go into the netlist. That may work for whole parts, but doesn't work when particular pins/nodes need to be separated from the board (thus the "/wiring"). -F