X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=2Z9kPooo88y3OiDMZ/z0qDADG/1f4ZG3Pa6b+ILQja0=;
        b=Iynp4pK4wH2LAdGNs7pWKhG54CexjYkig9u4LvHRO6JL159MJKRQ1CINRzmoYv6ihG
         8rbT1ZfD7hkAb28Ke9HuRvSw9Z0Gu1tT6hCG62uE2wBM9nXHqQ8Jh1cwGOxV/PngBZkg
         JTNgAoTIKRZzKmhibro/bUv18ZV4zHSfGFobYQmWdXg318Xict52MahREl3eeumoe0MB
         TbPGf4SdhrAvaZzEqoykWTCkLNGXhY3puiVTnZgki+neVvWToZXrGSaObQfiUqJgcLRC
         TgHPz14Ag6NS030pVsjdp47ldrQvGHg4sABAx5zujd+y/tqvhiSGaqVenXTiLHydrecS
         CmvA==
X-Received: by 10.28.55.209 with SMTP id e200mr17416921wma.2.1452172923592;
        Thu, 07 Jan 2016 05:22:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 14:22:02 +0100
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] A n... --> (gschem <--> pcb communication)
Message-Id: <20160107142202.ab177661cac910b51bd219ba@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <568E5F26.1010003@iee.org>
References: <CANEvwqikzNgQh-F3vyPevNEva+RkxR2UaCBi9of4am0b928NPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CACwWb3CmKxr69wB1LTrjFC2UKqZ8OrxtukdE0Z_8L70r8r8_dA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160107133431 DOT c6564c124413aa9eaf209d4c AT gmail DOT com>
	<568E5F26 DOT 1010003 AT iee DOT org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

No it is not but something is needed. Unless it provide a standarized mechanism an ordinay pipe might be a solution?

> Dbus might work .. but it creates a dependency .. is that desirable?
> 
> MJE
> 
> On 07/01/16 12:34, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> What I would like to be able to do is have a PCB layout up at the same
> >>> time I
> >>> have the schematic for that design up in gschem. If I select any part or
> >>> portion
> >>> of the layout in PCB that part or portion is visually highlighted in
> >>> gschem and
> >>> visa-versa.
> >>> ...
> > For the data there already is a mechanism for transferrering which hopefully could be used even if happens in "real time" but for notification I have heard the word dbus?
>