X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <568DFDAD.3040700@iee.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 05:54:53 +0000 From: "M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Merging stuff. How to make it happen References: <20160106192411 DOT 7d9fd782 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160106190750 DOT 32335 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:BVi3a57l2Jopa19v88OimphIKP0Sn65vfrP5oeySSUreIJSuJ3m rezT5q6CDWawLGQ+VtMu78bkMFTdzf8AvLqdFxhUKa+xufhtuFoBnJjgXcmGMK80z0/gfIv VYzNEfEuQ2RNlff0x0Nu3p73RhSFvn+IpqaqyKP0QnMV0UHWk+ctRqNYhv/nnR8hNAaRLBj FyV6KIqKIAhKRvKOsfugA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fhNAZn+/d9Y=:yjHVIeQsNGFZDBbkChb92m 3Kk7UG0T3F3DIbeGTV/jgL//CQfydsigrnm94HmpxYVy2qtS4+hoF7oe/nm71Afn4qaZhbYza zZhSraZwFkqgYZvz2yA2LN2UQaRk1gZjSvjlKgr4X0MLlCylmK6KqdhGtiGv6YJwXuvyYeaQY pw4fYfemJcZOsWzvOT70BdSws3R4dsJwV1qIz0qBAylOxTGXTNuXVXYjeO+ATVbjUCCZptn5a FEM/BV0rccGfuytHkmx2WkqLLdifk6NLKYXJw00Ay93cFLLrfRrUKQxNIPNjaUQdeGckwKDrx sC6xjgb6DbCHeneqeYH1N1c6uRNWYYm7MsPmZvJOpBLUovEGbpE2x4KBBMfz6d1KmcbC/1mhW TFBLhvgOcDNxMWBtN23rruWKa19RUp1F4ZcUarOkZCguKBO9ajvbkuc6fRcm9cfmiXvkrP/bv sZyzrKPS0bZdx2p6CcuRiu1udDN44oU/nJNlg7fyZ04vGxXmBJgSt32WpRiu44hbBqqRUQeLW ELK+Vi29AXHDfQWqVsMBztvvJ62aiJWh3pqAoALF7f186VbjRux8Mick9qTFutMyQcln9lrwT jliopKpCK63F2g8oux9300H4x1P1lhAFl2N+fMuDlSWJfZBRF8+m7IWVqMLjwf35/wHhWar9r xdhbAb7dJpnVE5UT3MbwzXvknwUxpbaAWSLuC0mcdPgTZ5Ti0zp9lqDBweLRpWswCoQL+Bn1g NJU2TnE4WwtpsfEZ Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com I think you should propose a change (of reformatting code) .. and let it 'sink' in .. and generate discussion .. and then set an appropriate release/milestone to achieve by. Coders can therefore share the burden amongst them, to achieve the goal, and Voila, you have code conforming to a 'standard' you're agreed on :) Michael. On 07/01/16 04:56, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> Indeed - we can document requirements, but auto-reformating large >> chunks of >> the code will cause un-necessary pain for people (like myself), who have >> outstanding patches that eventually want to be finished up and >> committed to >> HEAD. >> >> Peter > > Btw, if the project does decide to auto-reformat, please advertise > this on the list, there may be forks out there. > > I have the opposite of your problem: I'd like to reformat pcb-rnd, but > so far resisted the temptation to make my patches easier to apply to > mainline or other forks. Once the mainline makes that move, I won't > have a reason not to do it, this why I'd like to know about it by the > time it happens. > > Regards, > > Igor2