X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 01:27:34 +0100 From: "Stephen R. van den Berg (srb AT cuci DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] A fileformat library (blind/buried vias) Message-ID: <20160107002734.GB30864@cuci.nl> References: <20160105182120 DOT 3237F809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <8E0210CD-0694-4717-A7B1-3224E39691DA AT sbcglobal DOT net> <42CFD5A8-B3C1-4BB2-8D5E-7FF582332FCF AT noqsi DOT com> <201601061749 DOT u06Hnn50021843 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <61702EF2-1AE3-44B9-8B76-8D8357CE89FE AT noqsi DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61702EF2-1AE3-44B9-8B76-8D8357CE89FE@noqsi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Doty wrote: >On Jan 6, 2016, at 12:49 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >>> confusing grab bag of features >> details, please stay out of the conversation. You're being very >> disrespectful to a project that you don't even use. >I?m trying to explain how it appears to me. As far as I?m concerned, > these problems result from deep flaws in the technical concept. John, even though I value your opinion, the signal to noise ratio of these kind of insights on how things *appear* to you without actually offering patches to fix it is too low. Try to limit making remarks about how things appear without offering patches to a frequency of at most once per six months. We'll be able to remember it that long, any newcomers to the list will see it soon enough. -- Stephen.