X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BVKd2mxkXqBW8rGH+kSGckxV/XsDuvayIpCdZf8oGcM=; b=miWFMywwlmgjlqXfhkoklYFPi9G0gY9sTd14uMZ2ZN94MN4Rr1Gwh79TYrfCfNxEkT tFU0py8y4ZGAulSzfrMQoMCVuVOycMNlB+UEoAqy7OBz0U5Jcda3hUJb6/QNgBGjAVEG 281yonjX+VRLhuKsXPoURX578xtsCdHOM3gG9MidUNH/1+SaGyNiVNVdXAPPN7JtNyow BfdbKBjNF1XuNIUnkmd/cU94yWBDbyq8a0GFHWyUxIHzsFCqfW1yrX1IgwBZNOrTAOYn pR/PoG+2CsRhNyM35kH2ibGuQ10TEA81+/6/XeUqursBwzXrL5zgZhNT1zcXMUDka+ji cnZA== X-Received: by 10.28.49.3 with SMTP id x3mr12575768wmx.53.1452108931184; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:35:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:35:28 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] A fileformat library (blind/buried vias) Message-Id: <20160106203528.1d7a81820d8849e55eee6779@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <61702EF2-1AE3-44B9-8B76-8D8357CE89FE@noqsi.com> References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <20160105182120 DOT 3237F809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <8E0210CD-0694-4717-A7B1-3224E39691DA AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20160106135339.80f8121dd33! ! cddd92c5acb8a AT gmail DOT com> <42CFD5A8-B3C1-4BB2-8D5E-7FF582332FCF AT noqsi DOT com> <201601061749 DOT u06Hnn50021843 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <61702EF2-1AE3-44B9-8B76-8D8357CE89FE AT noqsi DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > >> For this pcb non-user, one of the biggest sources of confusion that > >> drives me away is that pcb does not really have layers at its > >> foundation. > > > > Of course it does. You just don't agree with its implementation. > > Don’t you understand that the insulating layers are layers? Where are they in the pcb stackup? How do I pattern them? I think there are cases then insulating layers need to be in the stackup. More important I think there is a need to put drawing primitives on any layer at all levels: layout, within footprint, within pad and pin and via. Nicklas Karlsson