X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20160106190240.31927.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:02:40 +0100
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Publically shaming John Doty for disrespectful
	behavior
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <CAC4O8c8zk8=Py1yX6fVqF+35SYe39Li=y4jZ8bCeZ1Ev8WccAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160105182120 DOT 3237F809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <8E0210CD-0694-4717-A7B1-3224E39691DA AT sbcglobal DOT net> <CAC4O8c8CxyULauKj+1RT73qdLDnPa1_TOAXY_pXnJNPtnNJYqQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <s6nziwjt23p DOT fsf AT falbala DOT ieap DOT uni-kiel DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601061228131 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <CAJXU7q-ygqW+Jok60vHC1dre9Q0aF4cUo8_5KXvouTW3L5c57A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <42CFD5A8-B3C1-4BB2-8D5E-7FF582332FCF AT noqsi DOT com> <201601061749 DOT u06Hnn50021843 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <61702EF2-1AE3-44B9-8B76-8D8357CE89FE AT noqsi DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5tiY7shzwSGI9p6W"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <61702EF2-1AE3-44B9-8B76-8D8357CE89FE@noqsi.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--5tiY7shzwSGI9p6W
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

John,

John Doty wrote:
> >> confusing grab bag of features
> >=20
> > John, I've asked you many times to please avoid using emotionally
> > charged words in your discussions.
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m trying to explain how it appears to me.

You need to stop doing that, and you need to stop it *right now*.

I already know how it appears to you, and I will not overlook that.
You can count on that.

You asked me to show you code and tools to support your workflow,
and I believe that our community will rise to this challenge and blow
you away with how much better our ideas work than what you expected -
but you will have to be patient, because it is not a small amount of
work. Meanwhile, you will show us the respect of staying silent while
we work. Thank you!


> As far as I=E2=80=99m concerned,

Everyone already knows your position. As DJ has already pointed
out you are being disrespectful to the community by rehashing it.


> these problems result from deep flaws in the technical concept.
> Don=E2=80=99t you understand that the insulating layers are layers?
> Where are they in the pcb stackup? How do I pattern them?

You are going on and on about a well-known property of PCB as if you
have discovered something new. Several people, myself included, have
told you in the past that this is an area that we will improve upon
in PCB. You have contributed to such improvement in design
discussion, even though you are not an active PCB user, which is
commendable and much appreciated by me and others.

Now, until you make further technical contributions, ie. source code
whih aligns with the direction and community of the project, you are
no longer able to contribute to this topic.


Stop posting about this now. I mean it. Consider this a warning.


Thank you

//Peter

--5tiY7shzwSGI9p6W
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWjWTQhR3Q0dhIfEgRAgZQAKDyAC/Ju2ZB3qHpFbZLUe8u5zAcwQCfZ40G
ZQN3nqvfi7aPwU1NytlyeVk=
=SzUt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5tiY7shzwSGI9p6W--