X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=1sARBrKNQuPxqsvL4s5YGpwUBEMmyeb07xnZiOg++lw=; b=cxBAXCe3Bn68GdF2JoSO6Abo558uWoH181ubB+eTqrsmoj9a1ovxPNHPyiTCc67OWG neFmOWpGtzRsTJBS6HSpJsnAUiuwVfAVtFtFiBgakoo18/Lv8gi/187WQxSUF22+Gwcs AzfLyHcTBTwVWxvMoPM/XPRXrPDHJBdvHAi+BpVw3JyJYZMgOL5zoYuXCNiJi3UgeSQK o8TlNW6R/eVVpS7X9hHQ89cXGRE+BqnCW3KeV6+aQt308ABikuS93d3YA7epd90bEhgG SFEejm5sGk98NksocWnMp0f3XvcIbKgbxZSShF9sspjwE7eXu3pHyTlUM+lF4QSgmawb BtDg== X-Received: by 10.107.47.20 with SMTP id j20mr35785587ioo.168.1451949613720; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:20:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com> <20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151229155647 DOT GA3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20151229175222 DOT GD3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <96A12FC1-E09C-4D63-8346-5A62FDAB4228 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <2F0AFAE8-ADAB-4DE0-A79C-DD87077E66B5 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20160104221259 DOT 0e2022ddcfdaefa997096480 AT gmail DOT com> From: "timofonic timofonic (timofonic AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:19:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership --> Slot for spice To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135335cf52c2305288a5c27 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a1135335cf52c2305288a5c27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have little else to add, but you should take a look at QUCS. These people are doing nice things :D On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:39 PM, John Doty wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT co= m) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > >>> Do the features in the backend require Scheme/Guile development, or > just > >>> Python? > >> > >> Just Python. > >> > >> Thinking about it, I'm not even sure if this behavior (treating the > slots > >> of a package as individual SPICE objects) is even necessary. The othe= r > >> SPICE backends don't seem to be using it. > > > > Spice do not care about slots ? > > > > Spice simulates subcircuits and elementary devices. How those map to slot= s > depends on the device and what about it you=E2=80=99re trying to simulate= . The way > gEDA has traditionally used pinseq to both identify pins for slotting and > sequence pins for SPICE netlisting is a serious complication. That=E2=80= =99s why I > made it possible for gnet-spice-noqsi to use pinseq (usually the default, > for backward compatibility), pinnumber (for physical packages), or pinlab= el > (for hierarchy). > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > --001a1135335cf52c2305288a5c27 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have little else to add, but you should take a look at Q= UCS. These people are doing nice things :D

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:39 PM, John Do= ty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:

On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>>> Do the features in the backend require Scheme/Guile developmen= t, or just
>>> Python?
>>
>> Just Python.
>>
>> Thinking about it, I'm not even sure if this behavior (treatin= g the slots
>> of a package as individual SPICE objects) is even necessary.=C2=A0= The other
>> SPICE backends don't seem to be using it.
>
> Spice do not care about slots ?
>

Spice simulates subcircuits and elementary devices. How those m= ap to slots depends on the device and what about it you=E2=80=99re trying t= o simulate. The way gEDA has traditionally used pinseq to both identify pin= s for slotting and sequence pins for SPICE netlisting is a serious complica= tion. That=E2=80=99s why I made it possible for gnet-spice-noqsi to use pin= seq (usually the default, for backward compatibility), pinnumber (for physi= cal packages), or pinlabel (for hierarchy).

John Doty=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Noqsi Aerospace, = Ltd.
http= ://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--001a1135335cf52c2305288a5c27--