X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nzwcWUzJhRUBGj8y57TgN+JB3XkHfzrb4MqIHY5jRp0=; b=t7pHkXQQ6f6jB1iLbnqRsujbkC7Z3qXC3E8JL0XQgz3AON41CxTUksAi05WvS14tFr j4Oh/ROJSP8GbwwdDsyPZGIzMQWdwi+3CU9t8V56oi0eCM+6RsGF9qQ0MMnbB2yTzBp3 I/ggh6b0fyjNq63C5jkCVEnuufawYWBxMG0Dj++BcOaEHVE1t8pkaa2GWClfqV94+n7f IMJrrVXQYNUFkHs5KklV1DliSWSAup4/Ht7DVayqMTy5vorVTgFINe608cZVXarM/Mti y+MnPRG/OmOSiA1jSgC0GAnscTGQPe/y7ZPyLrzYYj1qg9sNmG8GAlNuPzIdeqKlI0z4 +R8Q== X-Received: by 10.194.249.69 with SMTP id ys5mr93515459wjc.97.1451941981196; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:13:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:12:59 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership --> Slot for spice Message-Id: <20160104221259.0e2022ddcfdaefa997096480@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com> <20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151229155647 DOT GA3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20151229175222 DOT GD3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <96A12FC1-E09C-4D63-8346-5A62FDAB4228 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <2F0AFAE8-ADAB-4DE0-A79C-DD87077E66B5 AT sbcglobal DOT net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > Do the features in the backend require Scheme/Guile development, or just > > Python? > > Just Python. > > Thinking about it, I'm not even sure if this behavior (treating the slots > of a package as individual SPICE objects) is even necessary. The other > SPICE backends don't seem to be using it. Spice do not care about slots ?