X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5rKgrOqJ7FbdzGtl1ppg8UGdxnOrOde/9kvmpSoI+sk=; b=NnPN9uF3TYHWbwG11z23ms2WxHgr9nv+yrYQZSFCnRe/uf2XfbggSiQeMXkipUL/WH IqA6dWNwMST3+umYjC+VIQx5x1Dl7xSm7QYqgngnutHq2P1aAQSshgx4u6WZShmAf1+z /ReSUbPHLM7tGTlXtaqjeQWoLXN6gatdc7UeXWHDzWFYLGnODOpc0tpLo5fDexuz0X9/ iKubCamvjxq59z9hmlE0l4DgBhPD7NdZ5uYyAAHPtrk12u9BdZbHbWo8d/fdyrWhaTqT zr5JB5uVSg8gyh5gOEjmii/RQcEgeLAT8LImb0H1x8WbOFmCN1cxso+uRg8DN/Dl4lUw 2oLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.213.215 with SMTP id m206mr60933998oig.26.1451937257459; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:54:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201601041946.u04Jkn25014629@envy.delorie.com> References: <201601041946 DOT u04Jkn25014629 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:54:17 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Merging stuff. How to make it happen From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113de568779d850528877c7b Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a113de568779d850528877c7b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 4 Jan 2016 19:48, "DJ Delorie" wrote: > > > > With regards rewriting geometry functions, I'd be interested in a why - if > > they already worked. The old code looking ugly would be a fine reason, just > > be extra sure the replacements will be well behaved ;) > > They were being duplicated all over the place. We discussed this a > while back and agreed that collecting all the 2D/3D generic math > functions in one spot made sense. I'm drawing a distinction here between "collecting" and "rewriting". The later needs at least some justification. Peter --001a113de568779d850528877c7b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 4 Jan 2016 19:48, "DJ Delorie" <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>
> > With regards rewriting geometry functions, I'd be interested = in a why - if
> > they already worked. The old code looking ugly would be a fine re= ason, just
> > be extra sure the replacements will be well behaved ;)
>
> They were being duplicated all over the place.=C2=A0 We discussed this= a
> while back and agreed that collecting all the 2D/3D generic math
> functions in one spot made sense.

I'm drawing a distinction here between "collecting&= quot; and "rewriting". The later needs at least some justificatio= n.

Peter

--001a113de568779d850528877c7b--