X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZXiu9Bntsi57CqeT3SJamoWwxv6oMcXxKVzJQg052EQ=; b=YXQTfyIehqc1xuGOomXEsOA50vBp9qSMXUMzQiL8H8sia+JXBCqhqs8axaGGkmYOFs vsIjwZ40cPxiwo4Mh6DmSMn9ffCuempda0b42ajfKS0Olzj+wUzS6/uK/0aeXNh6+7DG +oGFfHvfZvq5QCVMMXpGgdB5sHh3j92KrNUYhqWFckJ1vGmZSjRH69dPiWkj8Y5O5wU9 5L+Y8I+CkeENIz4x8sYg5+Twm7Hc+ZR/nc8iTML9QspeEydksFFnOjpmnmdSG5es/sC8 L8iCLRt2MoPCmE/9mGX/UInHPO/XLM2wo0rZH2JKAlUHIeBLLFO+OCCxpyp6a1hCDqLV ExAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.111.164 with SMTP id ij4mr24853379igb.93.1451913687039; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 05:21:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <568A667E.4030807@iae.nl> References: <568A667E DOT 4030807 AT iae DOT nl> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:21:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Survey online? From: "Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4144768f846a052881ffba Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --047d7b4144768f846a052881ffba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Did you mean... gpcb? :-) On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:33 PM, myken wrote: > On 03/01/16 23:47, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> Any chance I could ask budding statisticians to determine information >> like this using an online survey (or some other method which doesn't >> involve so many emails? >> > > Survey online? No absolutely not. Isn't it great there are so many > (positive) emails!!! Doesn't it give us a good feeling there are so many > devoted PCB users? And these are only the ones that are "still" on this > list. And the great thing about it is that there are a lot of names I > rarely or never see on this list. Please keep adding yours! > > Thanks everyone, I needed that. I needed to hear that I'm not the only > non-developing user of this great piece of software. I needed to hear that > this project is not only the playground of a few developers but it is > actually used and enjoyed by many. > > In my humble opinion, dear users, it is OK to make yourself heard. > Wouldn't it be great if we could all be part in shaping the future of PCB? > > Thanks, > Cheers, > Robert. > --047d7b4144768f846a052881ffba Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Did you mean... gpcb? :-)

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:33 PM, myken <myken= @iae.nl> wrote:
On 03/01/16= 23:47, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
Any chance I could ask budding statisticians to determine information like = this using an online survey (or some other method which doesn't involve= so many emails?

Survey online? No absolutely not. Isn't it great there are so many (pos= itive) emails!!! Doesn't it give us a good feeling there are so many de= voted PCB users? And these are only the ones that are "still" on = this list. And the great thing about it is that there are a lot of names I = rarely or never see on this list. Please keep adding yours!

Thanks everyone, I needed that. I needed to hear that I'm not the only = non-developing user of this great piece of software. I needed to hear that = this project is not only the playground of a few developers but it is actua= lly used and enjoyed by many.

In my humble opinion, dear users, it is OK to make yourself heard. Wouldn&#= 39;t it be great if we could all be part in shaping the future of PCB?

Thanks,
Cheers,
Robert.

--047d7b4144768f846a052881ffba--