X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=faCtrrEQcDAOiaFvFw5V2J0QHGKrB4cSAuNtRV2y4Fo=; b=JgBH6sxN/Ip1t4G2FZVtr2J0f6fOjvq4yfE2Vje2p30i2/DqgeZ3ck7+JrI0nKVBDO 77q24d/ROwbA09o3bQ5zXTVyt5MXWiRA7g9TV3aT6+tO9sE+3HcC/JeiQcKQm+4YUMZs kyrvkVu3oBKU+ad8lRuKql80xqw3DBjQkn10SlCrIQMv6ZFFwvnT5y2CFWesnH/lgqup EIPdVFTw9DJOFqUppQocUtH558kePni5GSNf1DZMWUEUhK531NZAW1Fxx7PTgxCjkwJd RG3cIzkm1ZdCczbxCP78bmPUfFE9om/QvPiVPv713oj3LYJggvhQTPltkhkwg3Iz5vCM ye8g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.48.131 with SMTP id w125mr77846000wmw.18.1451873038638; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:03:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <20151222232230 DOT 12633 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <0F6F1D0F-4F07-48EA-90FE-836EAD4E2354 AT noqsi DOT com> <0FCF3774-F93C-4BFF-BB61-636F75DCCACB AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 17:03:58 -0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] A fileformat library From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114242a4ba272d05287888af Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a114242a4ba272d05287888af Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 5:48 AM, John Doty wrote: > Was the intended subject the *pcb* file format? > Yes. Sorry for using .sch as an example. It has a lot of the same issues as pcb as a format, but it's simple enough they don't end up mattering much and it's not worth changing at this point. I'm think I've said as much in the past. No apology needed. I=E2=80=99m a scientist, I=E2=80=99m used to this. I rec= all the time I > was publicly accused of =E2=80=9Cwitchcraft=E2=80=9D for digging out a re= sult using an > It might be possible to become too used to such things :) Sometimes you veer towards condescension, and I've definitely reacted with rudeness, so regardless of the nature of science there may be some room for improvement all round. Britton --001a114242a4ba272d05287888af Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 5:48 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wr= ote:
= Was the intended subject the *pcb* file format?
=
Yes.=C2=A0 Sorry for using .sch as an example.=C2= =A0 It has a lot of the same issues as pcb as a format, but it's simple= enough they don't end up mattering much and it's not worth changin= g at this point.=C2=A0 I'm think I've said as much in the past.=C2= =A0

No apology needed. I=E2=80=99m a scientist= , I=E2=80=99m used to this. I recall the time I was publicly accused of =E2= =80=9Cwitchcraft=E2=80=9D for digging out a result using an

It might be possible to become too = used to such things :) =C2=A0Sometimes you veer towards condescension, and = I've definitely reacted with rudeness, so regardless of the nature of s= cience there may be some room for improvement all round.

Britton
--001a114242a4ba272d05287888af--