X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aWJbDZFiFy7hzRInJnYCdcOg112zmDaR7KQ7wfFJ4jE=; b=i6x2vbhBtC4IES1Ed6oJ1z0ZJjYFI7mV2B6XhNBSzmf7YV832TGShAeZA4IF4q0DxI RIzLhF8fGy3PeJAc5MXzAjDkRL8BWMqwoovL1tAzPAC++WD39iU9E+pee5zei9ZmHizf YzA8v3VQghOaQz155EGLkPoV45KLZgjWZEVjI8u+tMW8NoBgZL6WGoo19bVapjd5Nxx1 dZOBXZOaM638DRXQt0sWsbYgMr6/7cO2oKKPV8okyPL5hNldc5IwudMzr0aTorqfaruo 1xGcn7Vlc8h3LMSWArWrm/gLaUMXFIkS2R7YBTDsPC4lOcGKgq9bpi2fh4CdN06hL2cn oAgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.246.43 with SMTP id xt11mr50112517oec.48.1451773193161; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:19:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201601022207.u02M7l9I028275@envy.delorie.com> References: <201601022207 DOT u02M7l9I028275 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:19:53 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Merging stuff. How to make it happen From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11368e4079131f052861494e Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11368e4079131f052861494e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ok, I'd still be interested to take a quick look, as there were one or two things that jumped out at me as possibly warranting some discussion. Peter On 2 Jan 2016 22:09, "DJ Delorie" wrote: > > > too. (If we catch Bert or DJ too by any chance, that would also be cool). > > If it's the set of patches I'm thinking about, I did the initial > review here on geda-user already. I think everything was resolved > except whether we wanted to require a C99 compiler or not. > --001a11368e4079131f052861494e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ok,

I'd still be interested to take a quick look, as there w= ere one or two things that jumped out at me as possibly warranting some dis= cussion.

Peter

On 2 Jan 2016 22:09, "DJ Delorie" <= dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> too. (If we catch Bert or DJ too by any chance, that would also be coo= l).

If it's the set of patches I'm thinking about, I did the initial review here on geda-user already.=C2=A0 I think everything was resolved
except whether we wanted to require a C99 compiler or not.
--001a11368e4079131f052861494e--