X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: karl AT aspodata DOT se To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] should we broaden scope of libgeda In-reply-to: References: <20160102091556 DOT BBC6D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> Comments: In-reply-to Roland Lutz message dated "Sat, 02 Jan 2016 19:41:50 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <20160102190222.63BE6809D79B@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 20:02:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Roland Lutz: > On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > On 2 Jan 2016 09:18, wrote: > > > Wouldn't it make sense to move things (that isn't related to a gui) > > > from gschem to libgeda ? > > It's more the other way round--libgeda contains many things which are > related to the GUI and should be moved to gschem. IMHO, it would make > most sense to pull the general-purpose and gnetlist-related functionality > out of libgeda and merge the remaining code back to gschem. ... So, what you are saying is mostly that we should leave libgeda as is for backward compatibility and move xorn to a more finished state, as far as scripting is conserned ? Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57