X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DYPLWg9EFD2wEKsbM7P2PdbGLRX1rz/oBGCrlKy40/8=; b=0u2gYLLCw7IIHz0/88K3ckZVD3cFq1nq05XWGiB0QqDnL+Y/yfQRAPymQNtNbJbVGk sAvs/7wYqK+bCzz+9yjQSpxydJsmY8HLxc9Z9XlBHJJ6OrZLaMvp46SY0kHy1M8hvp7t IFOHQGE20ZKTpyMcDQ4C2miPjZ5JVpNxUyZ26ABUfdQaHrv3kQj/Et/nvlRtYEbJz5Fg VYdc+gdy7gxIjR9SuCwThV14493lfjFokKQuMY1xiWbo5MQswMkE/+OMAdKLknSg57dp cZ6rIGFstm3aWdMHb1Qt8j4h+Vkh6sIWasYi4GyAejG8HRar3w36lLY9w1qQ9xIjJkP0 dTuQ== X-Received: by 10.112.138.135 with SMTP id qq7mr28325623lbb.21.1451755664794; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:27:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:27:39 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] ideas on slotting and mechanisms for grouping/associating heterogenous symbols. Message-Id: <20160102182739.5d195829880cf75768ae0a82@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56880043.7040003@ecosensory.com> References: <8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com> <87FC7D4C-157A-499E-8B93-97653D6A7C68 AT noqsi DOT com> <624E6A69-62CE-4FCB-9D44-9FDF036254A3 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <56880043 DOT 7040003 AT ecosensory DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > I would be interested to hear everyone’s ideas on slotting and mechanisms for grouping/associating heterogenous symbols. > > The symbol name (or refdes) should be the sole indicator that something is grouped. That is a group at the symbol level that has > no position or pin sequence order information in it. I agree, refdes is good choice. > I would use a separate script to process pin swaps that utilizes a pinswap number attribute that is > not part of symbols as they are in the library, but added when you need it. ... I agree swap information should not be part of symbols. It would however probably be good if pcb could handle swap especially pin swap of ordinary capacitors and resistors. Nicklas Karlsson