X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: karl AT aspodata DOT se To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] should we broaden scope of libgeda In-reply-to: References: <20160102091556 DOT BBC6D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> Comments: In-reply-to "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" message dated "Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:52:51 +0000." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <20160102131252.F383A809D79A@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 14:12:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Peter Clifton: > On 2 Jan 2016 09:18, wrote: > > Wouldn't it make sense to move things (that isn't related to a gui) > > from gschem to libgeda ? ... > For my point of view, moving some of the low level code from gnetlist, into > libgeda makes sense. It could start to allow a framework where we use > plugins that apply some of the semantic attribute meanings at a point > shared between the tools. (Meaning you can have smarter behaviours in > gschem whilst those workflow specific plugins are loaded). I would love to > see things like slotting move to being a plugin, for example. ... Interesting point. I stumbled upon this when looking into this (from the (priv) thread that was stopped by DJ (I think because my reply didn't come through)): John Doty: > Karl Hammar; ... > > A midterm solution would be to write a gnetlist backend which copies > > used symbols into a given directory. That could be a nice way to learn > > scheme and gnetlist perhaps. > > Gnetlist doesn't have an API through which it can find that data. > The gaf command, might, though. As far as I know, nobody is > exploring the possibilities of scripting gaf. ... So currently, if I want to write an "get all syms that this sch file referencs"-program I have to do it in c or don't use libgeda at all. I thought that kind of program could be a nice way to learn a little scheme, but the infrastructure wasn't there. Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57