X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=J9Pk1AU2FHBmsM0cZra7XyukQpnBJAnfMdyDGBKGi84=; b=E4KC1y8v9XA16pdNHPpppA67mS5ZW0NFuJNPGYjLUylmXbIxoKKpTe6FikmFQyIBfN Z8VzSeJs9VYAbxj973GEomZ0xUtraxsIaGwWPnbumja2qirS7b6uEyGx8+mLL5PURq8u s2x0ofP2i6oyUKbwjt0ybzoY21u9d6ZOhzpY5Mr716/QlO7+8S/Lj+1fLvfhG1H/N/ya e6GP5HvbZPeXxtJQrXQYAvPfzSWgL5ZcioznHkED15QeCjfZxH361ldn3uzCTDy0n5Jb 9H5u3/buZSw7QsF066qUT9m3HLS4Pw3/X0QbaiSgVfEXhFZuTeB2Er6VUfUwX7PtN9rI nddw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.171.35 with SMTP id ar3mr27210144lbc.90.1451694611753; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 16:30:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <80377E38-1252-40F3-8E55-87765087D4F2@noqsi.com> References: <8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com> <2297464D-0109-4CA8-98D5-AC33BD0B02C5 AT noqsi DOT com> <73273554-3E38-4F1F-9423-F731753B41D8 AT noqsi DOT com> <41F5814C-CBF1-4F51-8CFA-F9A2F56EC2EF AT noqsi DOT com> <306C32FA-255A-4B1E-8B00-BD21D7C37F67 AT noqsi DOT com> <978615B0-F33E-4B70-88C2-DC2D05E9C62A AT noqsi DOT com> <20160101200043 DOT 5df9dd41 AT levivo> <1736C9D4-3513-44F2-BBDE-F40C8EE8FA41 AT noqsi DOT com> <80377E38-1252-40F3-8E55-87765087D4F2 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 00:30:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user] Project leadership From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:12 PM, John Doty wrote: > > On Jan 1, 2016, at 1:28 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 8:17 PM, John Doty wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >>> >>>> I am not against people being unix literate. Requiring people to know >>>> how to use a command line is a good thing but scheme in the core is >>>> just too far. >>> >>> Yet a decade ago this was not a big problem. Scheme gave users the ability to export data to a variety of downstream flows, a unique gEDA capability. >> >> For the millionth time I am not trying to remove scheme! There are a >> lot of contributions there (gnetlist) and I would not suggest even for >> a minute removing them. >> >> The choice of scheme was a mistake > > I disagree. It was very fruitful. > >> but that is done and we have to >> keep it now. We should have another interface in parallel to it *not* >> replacing it. > > Well, what about Xorn? Xorn is one approach but I would rather add to what already exists than to use your word "dynamite" what is already there. If scheme bent the shape of the surrounding C then Python will do the same because the point of Xorn the python. Plus you need to look back at your records we have had this *exact* conversation at least once before and I think possibly even twice. >> >>> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. >>> http://www.noqsi.com/ >>> jpd AT noqsi DOT com >>> >>> >>