X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=f+GioZiHn5bgnyBnbHx5izcvnUrtUN/io2/olbv68b0=; b=QqTypLw9P0kpBT5vqXcNTAFAYgd+CeQmajBvvoZfAsGAC8HFLjikgTUmB++qLqDZb8 ufcQ48gKSv93DGn5nIIGewm9D6MXXJqkjf3Td6f0EtSFOLH1NathOUQNhmRzje+zVTLP Q7rIgyK97IZQ6qmwmF2ebkJ944SvZmPcvAmitVYojy4w5uGCfPpewvEh35fyNBBqwXqx 5O+H1dZUP529agnh+c7LSBUn9mFfNnhVZTtRvkK5zli/msplTHDYZc2JIQD72b/dsyKH NMbIVDjf2l3QItVvYVXwj/uPImlRlL4lNo0mwpL53GAoMx2msOBERJUaGqBj2tIY+Ony p/ag== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.233.132 with SMTP id tw4mr48377857oec.35.1451694128338; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 16:22:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20151230181538 DOT 32790b5b AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <201512310212 DOT tBV2C3MK029574 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151231024721 DOT GC19555 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20160101202812 DOT 4d57f392 AT levivo> <028035D4-DD63-49A6-AD9E-27C4FE23C600 AT noqsi DOT com> <201601012339 DOT u01Nd7gg017113 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 00:22:08 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Positive discussion topic thread From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136b270d79ea705284ee012 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a1136b270d79ea705284ee012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I guess if you expand the acronym GPL.. that is true (GNU Public Licence) :-), but to my knowledge we've never been a GNU project. The g=3DGNU or g=3DGPL misconception is a common one I think, one which the original authors corrected me on in the past. Anyhow - perhaps venturing off topic for this thread. Best wishes, Peter On 2 Jan 2016 00:07, "Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > > >> I always thought that the "g" stood for GNU. > > > > The "g" in "gEDA" has always stood for "GPL'd". > > You=E2=80=99re both right. > > > --001a1136b270d79ea705284ee012 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I guess if you expand the acronym GPL.. that is true (GNU Pu= blic Licence) :-), but to my knowledge we've never been a GNU project.<= /p>

The g=3DGNU or g=3DGPL misconception is a common one I think= , one which the original authors corrected me on in the past.

Anyhow - perhaps venturing off topic for this thread.

Best wishes,

Peter

On 2 Jan 2016 00:07, "Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:<= br type=3D"attribution">

>> I always thought that the "g" stood for GNU.
>
> The "g" in "gEDA" has always stood for "GPL&#= 39;d".

You=E2=80=99re both right.


--001a1136b270d79ea705284ee012--