X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3D80A458-450D-4BB8-9541-A4F49E0FFBBF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601012231450.1728@newt>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:53:53 -0700
Message-Id: <AE52C1DB-01A3-43FA-AE8E-68AD33F37180@noqsi.com>
References: <CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300544550 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <87FC7D4C-157A-499E-8B93-97653D6A7C68 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1601012231450 DOT 1728 AT newt>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_3D80A458-450D-4BB8-9541-A4F49E0FFBBF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Jan 1, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, John Doty wrote:
>> There are several alternate notions of how slotting should work. If =
you want slotting in gschem, you should load a suitable script.
>=20
> Could you please explain in more detail how you think slotting should =
work?
>=20
>=20

I=92m agnostic, except that it should be handled by optional scripts, =
not hard-wired into gschem and gnetlist. Also, we should not be using =
pinseq for both ordering connections in flows like SPICE and identifying =
pins for slotting. How we untangle this is a tough question. At least =
gnet-spice-noqsi doesn=92t depend on pinseq, although it defaults to =
using pinseq for backward compatibility.

Various people have suggested various approaches over the years. I would =
invite them to restate their positions or point us at their posts.

One problem with heterogeneous slotting is knowing when a bunch of =
symbols with the same refdes form a complete description of a part =
without duplication. My gnetlist back ends gnet-check-pincount and =
gnet-check-duplicates are effective at detecting errors in heterogeneous =
slotting from the bottom up. They don=92t require that the symbols =
somehow encode the knowledge of which other symbols they should partner =
with.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_3D80A458-450D-4BB8-9541-A4F49E0FFBBF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=i0u2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_3D80A458-450D-4BB8-9541-A4F49E0FFBBF--