X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20160101143648.18068.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:36:48 +0100
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user]
	Project leadership
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <1512300255 DOT AA07097 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1512300255.AA07097@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Mychaela Falconia wrote:
> > Pcb is dependent on geda-gaf to be useful.
> 
> Wrong: I can prepare a netlist for pcb import with my ueda tools (the
> recently discussed Verilog board design entry method w/o graphical
> schematics) without ever using geda-gaf.

And my workflow is different still - when I'm designing rather than
documenting I tend to usually write netlists by hand instead of
drawing a schematic. :) John might say this proves his point about
easy-to-use interchange formats. I would just as happy with another
format that wasn't text, which was fairly human writable. I guess the
same is true for most people.

Anyway, this thread has gone out of control. Please settle down
everyone, take a step or two back.


Thanks

//Peter