X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XUh60LexHEE41ITSfRXp0HXbXjx1nQ8saHXjclIU69s=; b=ki4+UbE/tSds/1O9qavUzW6aBP9qRLpTJj6jskDcvIkqhS91i5E2nEm1oskAZ5QpsL VLqoX23zN/2Wfpt/g/9Qak3AQNriXMjwQ8dc7hT0to+Qqn10T+DRuZJ/2UMUbJxD3akD cSA/+8kMhEVuPQpLqCk1CJyeQddwz9kYQV754sHKQ0MDLCdKeINTfLcWJHJRXpjoOvpi W2JM9LS+1G0+poO8AgSiqGXPCCF5UMBcmgmlOrE7wFelkZ91AKmfA3h2SkvkAG9u00/L STdqd9iTWaAddVtHE8xngMtJcukfTolZVqDmrCIPSx8A5Ytyxgr/aPJSdljUJKGJX0AU 9GUw== X-Received: by 10.112.205.10 with SMTP id lc10mr24814705lbc.31.1451594166608; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:36:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 21:36:01 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] (design error in the core of gschem --> Annotated schematic) Message-Id: <20151231213601.64a9550ba8e44dccbe75ed4a@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42C12FD5-878A-4FC3-A1EB-DF14BC57E018@noqsi.com> References: <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com> <449C2A4A-814E-4858-ACB3-82807A80BE8A AT noqsi DOT com> <7C27D3F4-9CC2-46DB-BE88-77564F3FC0FC AT noqsi DOT com> <20151230192636 DOT fc377052d1b3314ceb5fd4c7 AT gmail DOT com> <20151230203226 DOT 0fca70d4bc42aeac7d73d1ad AT gmail DOT com> <42C12FD5-878A-4FC3-A1EB-DF14BC57E018 AT noqsi DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:47:06 -0700 John Doty wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > Forward annotation is a lot simpler than backward and is probably a lot better choice for all data that are added after the schematic is done like for example a such simple thing as some of the common fields in the header. It may also be useful for simulation output. Basically it make sense for all data added later in the design flow. > > > > Are you able add the attributes to the symbols to get "graphical" output? > > I’m not sure what you mean. > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com In the annotated schematic do the text end up on the schematic or in a table or similar somewhere?