X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=6iDJErRrij1f7rdYY4rzYR4eMNq1peqi+SDIRDIiMyA=;
        b=h0krEgehLsnBDP9iRumBveBt2mfc933HTLsYyatOXoOVCxnWGFOLEy241s70OFeRHP
         C3Fn3c0HUITGQrItWGR4PrKT1JJhkIulqQkaG9Y56/wIPepiNog11kgleEkQUI4RWO/O
         j2oDB8XdVHThMRl4pcov8uayrAhYOsGYy/BqlvM9vMjP9KiQEpGgaUPGeK6GvvsTCkzu
         YD1SD1qXwbfamwSyAgihxM8v3Z0evvZAZw2Rljjmv72UZtw4ABlC0CXMNBGYpDK4PZyJ
         5cseRDHVlCbwrdWIYNwwjncfNmv8maksOZyXmublSI4B5+Cr4vv42cJSzcZz2om2JlXM
         zRvg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.167.208 with SMTP id q199mr4454991lfe.61.1451550123217;
 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:22:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151231024721.GC19555@localhost.localdomain>
References: <CAJXU7q8BsPKicvAgFvaigLBmT9CS3dJ_eFYR84mwWEg-=Vyg8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q9RrJO8=rLG5rdnH_MHQRCO8oghxoGrsao7NfSMEPb+0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151230181538 DOT 32790b5b AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<201512310212 DOT tBV2C3MK029574 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20151231024721 DOT GC19555 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:22:03 +0800
Message-ID: <CANDNR8qUCtttCn=euybPM0Zga+zv97Hxk5NO21HowX5p7pADAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Positive discussion topic thread
From: "Atommann (atommann AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

2015-12-31 10:47 GMT+08:00 Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>:
> nnnn
> I would suggest just 'geda-pcb'. This name wouldn't break our
> community and possibly wouldn't insult anybody. It wouldn't
> require any changes in our current documentation, either.

How about a shorter version 'gpcb'?
This follows the naming convention, like gschem, gnetlist, etc.

-- 
Best regards,
Atommann