X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WdSbqkH0R/lVBZSLTZekbD9EVND7UUVpG6giz58hLIQ=; b=q/t1hnvE3qf/Q9izGPwdhIQZc4ZOS/LlQ+sSAUaPbnxQGiwQefIDmVTnRZnOBSy6hr lhol7HOWeo7CEBhYD7BwfJXhnzEEDlivI1fhhuupZuZ6iVvTwlaDWJ5UrtDNSbe68Nsi L+8Y2Af/zqpNa7/nl2qtspzHFGLvzqmlINwo5ARZ1Uh3/ABcEJsPwzZrMwzJpAq8jXhi s3r08SqGR1i86yYSPm02dOwVqCwvD4cAlfA2Zq2XLrasmdNZAXfx0pFHUWx2sU8qnskl SFbok8TTXhI3fNfdVxssiqxVoDZHonmGPQ0RmIaCJKsWV9g/j+bp4ueUDO++k8q8X3Qz +nZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.209.138 with SMTP id i132mr41638525oig.122.1451511098680; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 13:31:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: svenn DOT bjerkem AT gmail DOT com In-Reply-To: <1CF084D0-03F1-44E0-BB1E-0E3907337C5C@noqsi.com> References: <20151220122659 DOT 378AF809D791 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20151220120219 DOT c4644eef1a65b0eb2fb60d76 AT gmail DOT com> <20151220125839 DOT 10228 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151220133436 DOT 0B120809D791 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <0BA0A334-56C7-47B7-959F-C0131BED822C AT noqsi DOT com> <20151220173341 DOT fb4442a7816009e9f4e943b6 AT gmail DOT com> <20151230180007 DOT B4391809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <1CF084D0-03F1-44E0-BB1E-0E3907337C5C AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:31:38 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wI9v9bLlc_yAibejfd3rG5Ux1IU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] XML file format (what could be expected) From: "Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBULVgNu008732 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 30 December 2015 at 19:44, John Doty wrote: > I think it’s related to a preference for step-by-step thinking. I contribute to the Mathematica Stack Exchange group, and the most common thing I see that makes code hard to understand and debug is that some insist on coding step by step with For[] rather than transforming whole structures with Map[], Thread[], etc. The same thing applies to those who struggle with Scheme, I think. Something like Casio vs HP way of entering numbers to be calculated? -- Svenn