X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Yc/O4Q4eqysxZqSF3KM6uGpgSRfVN1Cp3dQQBgwSg2k=; b=uAJKlYmAAqEeks4K4K+osSzWfCiwGAGB/BEAFksiGa4H1R31HR+tDC9axU6dGqLmP4 7HLfImp/ViLx2exvxNOiTPu9CxIx/sVWhGrX1/PwMch6G7l2fBOCMvi7zqmS3s+Q4rgO rbQ4JQ95kYzQoxSix0Dl2TYFk9/lx4esBVs8zuL+jophINsBTifFfJZSoqQIqoefzt5X KVR1fm0doqj13fL2clxYW3Cta6PsxR+jEalIvVsr7rhATQxo5solkYb7zolnVPAua/A6 14ZjtziPjBSO9Ib+MG+xRWV2hA10u3TRjY1mGVi2hm8wvPiZp+hC5NBG/C79wLtOsh8n xeLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.85.146 with SMTP id j140mr37053046oib.4.1451508964956; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:56:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:56:04 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] SnapEDA... From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d216e3ea0a2052823c407 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a113d216e3ea0a2052823c407 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 SnapEDA does indeed look cool. The business model is familiar, and I don't think its the only one of its kind out there. (And there are similar solutions out there in the 3D CAD space). For me - the sticking point, is the requirement for data-conversion.... we CAN... do better, and ideally - this is an area where we in the open-source community, should be beating these commercial guys! Peter On 19 December 2015 at 00:37, Jason White (whitewaterssoftwareinfo AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Disclaimer, I am not affiliated with SnapEDA. This service was briefly > mentioned in another thread; from what I have seen so far it is worth > sharing in its own thread. > > SnapEDA (see [1]) > -> Free commercial use and export of their library of symbols and > footprints > -> Exports to Kicad/Eagle/Altium/Orcad/PADS/etc... > - (Its a shame gEDA isn't on that list, not that it isn't hard to > convert...) > -> No apparent usage limitations or vendor lock-in required. They seem to > make money not by selling their symbols, but by selling symbol creation and > batch exporting services. > > Their business model is uncommon, I think, most companies of this type > require subscriptions. > > So far I have downloaded symbols for a few microcontrollers and FPGAs; > they look fine and match up with datasheets as far as I can tell. I'm going > to give their library a test drive by building a design using a few > exported parts. > > --Jason White > > [1] snapeda.com > --001a113d216e3ea0a2052823c407 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
SnapEDA does indeed look cool. The business= model is familiar, and I don't think its the only one of its kind out = there. (And there are similar solutions out there in the 3D CAD space).
For me - the sticking point, is the requirement for data-conver= sion.... we CAN... do better, and ideally - this is an area where we in the= open-source community, should be beating these commercial guys!

Peter

On 19 December 2015 at 00:37, Jason White (whitewaterssoftwareinfo AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-use= r AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
Disclaimer, I am not affiliated with SnapEDA. This service= was briefly mentioned in another thread; from what I have seen so far it i= s worth sharing in its own thread.

SnapEDA (see [1])
-= > Free commercial use and export of their library of symbols and footpri= nts
-> Exports to Kicad/Eagle/Altium/Orcad/PADS/etc...
=
- (Its a shame gEDA isn't on that list, not that it isn'= t hard to convert...)
-> No apparent usage limitations or = vendor lock-in required. They seem to make money not by selling their symbo= ls, but by selling symbol creation and batch exporting services.

Th= eir business model is uncommon, I think, most companies of this type requir= e subscriptions.

So far I have downloaded symbols for a f= ew microcontrollers and FPGAs; they look fine and match up with datasheets = as far as I can tell. I'm going to give their library a test drive by b= uilding a design using a few exported parts.

--Jason White=

[1] snapeda.com

--001a113d216e3ea0a2052823c407--