X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2LENHzmBxPzGeB6zh56DnppeafiL54MAA8hp21ZByoQ=; b=q658cdsnzdwsYj6IIMNH6y0hsS/NRf0srngBfvfLS6+6xRKca9kOigNFlvzEAm3hrl h25czPtnfl83TEauT338QrefG+7DX7Vwl8eQfJBSCDtGScc5qOsH91jwHAw5qbwly0CP GuFYqgQ0G1aUkokY85qzr7new3CNDQCOn7DHy8LkUmGddy3tXmA3qM7DiFaqA+NaX7An luK5phVgqR+P+sjF2thTPAB9kmcvw0ZRrGVk8IDA0CyqVJzP26oVj9bcD92M5W4IWewo zo4mN8Dqy9UKW5JIyCU0XZa4SQr4hU2AwFPTeVPozVRSat+kibf8eLLpRhnuuwZP52fy elRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.116.97 with SMTP id jv1mr69752334wjb.38.1451481766706; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 05:22:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201512291857.tBTIvAkA032000@envy.delorie.com> References: <5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com> <20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151229155647 DOT GA3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201512291857 DOT tBTIvAkA032000 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:22:46 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 12/29/15, DJ Delorie wrote: ... > As for Xorn, there was a contributor who had an exciting new idea and > was willing to do the work. Should I have sent him off on his own? > One more person lost to geda? If you have issues with the xorn > integration, discuss them and fix them, or agree to un-git them. I > will not apologize for trying to inspire new developers. I don't ask to. I see your point and am fine with it. (I am sorry, if my previous message wasn't polite enough.) Consider my previous message in the thread to be the second attempt to discuss our policy wrt the geda-gaf repository. Its current state bothers me very much, though I wouldn't decide its lot myself for obvious reasons :p Probably we should do it in the other list. What do our dear developers think? ;) (BTW, I have some ideas though I'm afraid I may have too little time to discuss them before I will be busy with training my liver with some "soft" drinks.) Thanks, Vladimir