X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=zMfseQ26o9jx/YLaLOSLZ2XKcX4PiGWo96VaHSagNpI=;
        b=dfAiFhD1jdNQ1dQLJadk2bjYCv1Tb/S9hBuqzeJ2Q4BKxkJFH9eYlgSVE+J9eGtjKo
         WbEy+lF78QzVuEPxH7BVDBlE2v64XEYVBYXVB5quf3aaCxRp5ODMLhlnR39lE27Ct17r
         uAQ548wjGdUT3Yv8FFuIrJpds67YmtANS5GNoGCokeeVAalcpgtxUJeBQISBMVLQ4Ttx
         Kfz0HFvG0WquHvNNmBRNBc9D+6IjQjynxnagy6s/Z53ak+S3fBi+ZFULmZpEqlcHNw+9
         vKCEhlyhXNe/LLgZsqjQB5I11KGyoOLaOx/KqB78sFn5MYNjxVaeAz2MUMmMQqNdUAW3
         +UGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.187.67 with SMTP id l64mr50762950wmf.39.1451467579039;
 Wed, 30 Dec 2015 01:26:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E811E14E-7BAE-4B45-86A9-2AF41F6F96B5@sbcglobal.net>
References: <CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<E811E14E-7BAE-4B45-86A9-2AF41F6F96B5 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:26:18 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMvDHVA48zD5vaZFGj1XavVNcHKAgLY9YD5=9RLF7aPoJf1Tpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user]
 Project leadership
From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 12/30/15, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 12:45 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> could be miss interpreting your plan here but it sounds like you are
>>>>> going to replace more of the C with Scheme.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, that's my plan :)
>>
>> Good plan.
>
> Hopefully, Guile/Scheme will be working on Windows.

I built 1.9.2 and it worked for me. I used the development guile
version, though. However, nobody wanted to package it and I don't
want to spend time on this, either, since I don't use Windows
myself.

Cheers,
  Vladimir