X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3119B251-9A7D-4AF5-9810-E07EDDDDDDBE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (design error in the core of gschem) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 23:29:05 -0700 Message-Id: <60B648A5-0D17-47E2-A2CB-1F1FD9DBA4A9@noqsi.com> References: <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com> <449C2A4A-814E-4858-ACB3-82807A80BE8A AT noqsi DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_3119B251-9A7D-4AF5-9810-E07EDDDDDDBE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via = geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 5:52 AM, John Doty wrote: >>=20 >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:29 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> A common netlist/bom format with a canonical form (so equivalent = netlists would be identical) would be a useful intermediate. >>>=20 >>> Could work. To me, the current patch format is much cleaner. I = already have fully working code both in pcb-rnd and gschem. If you = implement an alternative solution that is at least as capable, let me = know. >>=20 >> I=92m not saying get rid of your patch format. But you took a = shortcut generally not available by having pcb make the patch directly. = Some more general approach is needed. Common, canonical forms of netlist = and BOM could drive patch file generation, and they could be useful for = other things (as others have noted). >=20 > It is a documented format for passing information in. Why not add a > tool (as you have suggested in other moments over and over) to support > other PCB programs. That=92s what I=92m suggesting. Or, more precisely: A tool for each netlist and BOM format to convert to canonical form. A tool to make Igor=92s patch file from the differences in the canonical = files. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_3119B251-9A7D-4AF5-9810-E07EDDDDDDBE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWg3mxAAoJEF1Aj/0UKykRRwIP/3yooucgoGAsEivFoGE4oW1D XRtRjakJM3pfRwMYTodUlSPd08FF9FQd3oxaFf4ny34BMXH5k316hqO/rURKwzlF eIpJsEW+8JMR7Q8dUFd2iMIMlvkYi5NJZHrVl3RuFzU7VeR6oomAvwXy1E6dmrXY XV5U7a3tjY0mAVxDUZB8QUbCn4rXbaFILjCKqWSj5hR1s3cLw6r2e5PsT7qIMuE9 mc4IEyOfFLL0f7cVJ1tq4wTX9puHtyukEF865eD6T5V9NDAD9/r2mFBQh5zaUrLj OTUe0o91jVhtj3O0IZwLF5gxzm6NNEmXnr+c2hq3F4ujBUghF08TZlM/K6aiVzXb k8gAY+NL4wi/kCL2opuh50of2a9z8huFu2k/I1pGQABuUgltU9ILT5dCsyA9YOG+ oTqYv5LEpNRaHuPFkwELEIvhPTgeksPOnrZ8ob3zFvK2fiZcQxZwcD12G3RBnagq GxSb77AvKk5HzeXuUZgf3uBT6Yqg1NVIGdV71zQHID3uqOz+cBBa5MteYDU+Ma3P RmNiYYi9l8+QbHiHqSFjA9v3Y6P55VeIjlPHor7VVo7eeEAkw3CJ9DTBRFuETFd6 NyHvO6iEUt4XvkBg3CShcQCgnmb7wxjjuaEid9ILnEace/aFH/HIUnW/+0km/c28 b7eifHMLLJXq0VP6K1r6 =WK9d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_3119B251-9A7D-4AF5-9810-E07EDDDDDDBE--