X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 06:34:30 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
In-Reply-To: <9505CB3C-CCD5-470F-A688-71F6913416F8@noqsi.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1512300633380.9035@igor2priv>
References: <CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <201512282324 DOT tBSNOIqW029691 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <E6DDDCA9-3C61-4A1C-AAE0-779D414A7D40 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhRZzAQAghLQJwcLA3dspbTP=a6N2Bwdy602uw8mRwEvrA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAC4O8c9VHFXCqFiJqMi2P4yPLuWhZFbzhyTKn-6yzUo+SgRHXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300520110 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
 <9505CB3C-CCD5-470F-A688-71F6913416F8 AT noqsi DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, John Doty wrote:

>
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 9:25 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> John doesn't want gschem to get busted because he's been burned by
>>> changes in the past.  He's welcome to sound the alarm over anything concrete
>>> that he knows may cause breakage.  We can object if his criticism is too
>>> vague of unfairly singles out pcb for criticism.
>>
>> I'd agree if it was the case. My impression is that he doesn't want gschem to be CHANGED at all.
>
> I don?t want changes that inadvertently break things, as has happened in the past.


Unfortunately your definition of what changes "break things" is: any. Why 
don't you just fork?