X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at papyrus.altaweb.hu
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 21:29:43 +0100
From: "Kovacs Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user]
 Project leadership
Message-ID: <20151229212943.2d486c8c@wind.levalinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Organization: logonex.eu
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; i586-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 boundary="Sig_/18XYM9DkJMeYMHoIUtr+Cnm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/18XYM9DkJMeYMHoIUtr+Cnm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:43:17 -0500
"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT del=
orie.com> wrote:

> gEDA is struggling for a lack of development and scheme turns off a
> lot of wood be contributors. We need people who....
> 1. Don't fight so much.
> 2. Know about EDA software.
> 3. Have time to work on the project.
> 4. Know all the languages involved in the project.
>=20
> That is a lot to ask.

Yes.

gEDA is too conservative - I believe. gEDA states it is 'open'. It is open
source, but the people are closed, and afraid of new technology. We move on,
or die.

I gave up convincing everyone that we need to change this and that.

I'm so tired of all this. I also have 1000 things to do. I also wrote some
scripts for gEDA, and I fear that I have to throw them away... not because
the project will evolve into something new, but because, I have to change t=
he
toolset.

However, I think gEDA is still a good idea. A set of tools, communicating on
well defined interfaces. I still think this is the way to go... but if we
continue this endless discussions without any direction, we are going to do=
 it
for ourselves, just for its own sake, which makes no sense.

Think!

Levente


--Sig_/18XYM9DkJMeYMHoIUtr+Cnm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWgu0/AAoJECHeg32hsZ8oLJIH/jHJXklwx7F33QryG6KmNoxB
TwVzoapStVIFQhvenQC13gjEQQAeFQnZ737C5/gPR4MuGlKHXTL3MREh4YFBg1Qo
i5XkEt7ulJBHmtE42uN8iK+RipL99i9NKDCjjjheg69bjs0apHkT+IaqZoDyIjGb
O6W4y2AXRt7YTU4Ed/Dg6yDAq9zhR4XdIsRU3quCU410APx9MvetXsTOrRnMGeH8
DUT+mQpLXukj6fCYhF9HZmOv39kZkOosm5L0mZz1le8d755XXiWNaBusaESXlilB
6OrcU3Z0M3W1GXKDK4cdExXgFVlf80Q1dwSnw7gmBvlcJH8Q9GDUu/aVGJjp/U8=
=kxsc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/18XYM9DkJMeYMHoIUtr+Cnm--