X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=Pfp5YpisiYDzFiSmTpoXkQoLMicePIlXsNTKN55DMi8=;
        b=KbmZbvu/dwBo9PE3uNGzeyohvnistRiufBF/JYDLkggsPeEXZY6MZHzQrMG1tJIWZ4
         K7FNNNy3d6Zc8Qus9SWAsZTPEXpFCxavdgkbl4qfD9DQa6GYlYnz68zIXPWtvVCiGJ6U
         BuHps1S3RXrt0Z7q/x1GevGMPadurEwqj2o2ZPruLnmZ3f2c+ToP28OiLUEhwVpu9OJj
         Ki9gZfAdxodxuUd0ib2Ry2GPUgBen8PmHt2RK5WX4z4Ld54RdtvWXo4YQyVoz21h5Uwm
         J0ebyTEL1BQnnfA7JZ1TncyyYSj+ZJhuA3yno7QaGee5TnTXafWFMaPnBA3M5dbn5j7h
         Rl5w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.232.84 with SMTP id f81mr4719837oih.103.1451343233979;
 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Sender: svenn DOT bjerkem AT gmail DOT com
In-Reply-To: <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C@noqsi.com>
References: <CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:53:53 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uRriYCKX_k3vjI14Sedy2Xpa8gw
Message-ID: <CAGde_xPX8FB57SR-siOf5Udien1H04VVLd4fEFmJJDn30U4MvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
From: "Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 28 December 2015 at 20:48, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
> There are really two projects here: The original gEDA (now confusingly
> called geda-gaf), and pcb. I think everyone agrees that pcb needs a lot of
> work. On the other hand, geda-gaf is matiure, effective, and easy to extend
> with scripting. Pcb development requires a great deal of collaboration.
> Geda-gaf development mostly does not, as anybody can write and publish a
> script.

I would not call a generic schematic capture tool mature until it
provides the designer use of buses and bus pins in his design without
the need to actually name the nets to have connection.

-- 
Svenn