X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=HTmrpCXQ4TFsyLEpWq2ezhhsjkR4wV5Da30ggKIgtnE=;
        b=VSjLvDDYv+Zc08AMml5rgsL6vTXQ2JNsJgyexClv3SPOj4jgc4x904cDHJ4gAxwhNl
         +kmziagEBfIrO/7UuLyxjiLtciTh//TwRfdGvs84vtQCCmHrCgXgLfcsAUVYcu0hu8c7
         6oI+LO8RCuOGv33bbIdWXKCZv7H/a7YZPeHuKH0jQBqors+JWA896eHk7VTACvs6hIUX
         hZvrpmUuFtLGdwWSniEhSh1FIl80hEB3BG28KZsqPBHHQtr4KF3DlhRnPcBrm3SEztnA
         jujft85Auzj7z9mlSNemPApUiU4WQ63xRRtwRD/Am6mnB21rnxZfn2k/shRmOxuTmBWj
         VsYg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.6.196 with SMTP id d4mr49965394wja.120.1451158973394;
 Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:42:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:42:53 -0900
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c9zz3X9K-E4fAwjKEdLjNiSLo6FTObDo7vbCm+0yb6ipg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [geda-user] using DRC for other clearance values -- probably a bad idea
From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d49761f366f0527d247b3
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

--047d7b5d49761f366f0527d247b3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I previously said existing DRC could be used for this.  Unfortunately I
guess that for cases where larger clearances are desired, it's often
because of electromagnetic considerations, which means that it's probably
really an inter-layer requirement, which means existing DRC code would not
be useful.  Sorry.

Britton

--047d7b5d49761f366f0527d247b3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div style=3D"">I previously said existing DRC could b=
e used for this.=C2=A0 Unfortunately I guess that for cases where larger cl=
earances are desired, it&#39;s often because of electromagnetic considerati=
ons, which means that it&#39;s probably really an inter-layer requirement, =
which means existing DRC code would not be useful.=C2=A0 Sorry.</div><div s=
tyle=3D""><br></div><div style=3D"">Britton</div></div>

--047d7b5d49761f366f0527d247b3--