X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GrmKq9Qhaw55mZ2FXkvEvf24N1SgU2jA0S8iMPtF+G0=; b=ku/MLs/ZZz18r3SMwTM2Giau6sTXHoWixMADfQghe6kjK+K2karXKUbNrJJ152kC+Z S4soOc1rTUUo1MalcoqMICM+pmj2Dm1eZhrEgq/BA0KtJUtZHhv6wGE6FkgJ7ZyV38dp rzxg+sEGLP9w0qpH9OitgyQ4ZVwQ0/ZqlgnzoZm1SgUU1Sj/+xI2hv3cwJYt8RLQsofH E9MKMWNRXoGgiByfH19levG84YXqzDFP1nJbsvyGAF3ZZWx07PDkFRRQVAed7t6ltWMk yPTHKtBw/5H+Vf+FEyNFQ2NiwC+zy8QHWbR/dD9dwO7Xql64IB4Z4gW/X4LLLUJCrA08 5v+w== X-Received: by 10.194.114.164 with SMTP id jh4mr32881279wjb.153.1450868052816; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 02:54:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:54:11 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (gEDA symbols indexing, User --> Category) Message-Id: <20151223115411.7338fd3eae8d954c448cfde0@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201512230849.tBN8nlCv013961@envy.delorie.com> References: <5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com> <20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151222224539 DOT 824d0603398b862d574e1ab4 AT gmail DOT com> <20151222222341 DOT 8107 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151223094656 DOT 8074649b54c489dc3c24cabd AT gmail DOT com> <201512230849 DOT tBN8nlCv013961 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:49:47 -0500 DJ Delorie wrote: > > > As is now symbols at gedasymbols are avaialable per contributor > > basis. It would be a lot easier to find suitable symbols they where > > available per category basis with a note who contributed it. They > > could of course be available in both directions. > > It's a lot easier to do access control if it's set up as one directory > per user. Plus, I prefer to keep things in per-user areas for > copyright reasons. > > Grouping the available data in other ways is the job of a script or > CGI :-) With a script contributors could access files on a per contributor directory basis while they are also available for download on category basis. I guess creating links are enough.