X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:49:47 -0500 Message-Id: <201512230849.tBN8nlCv013961@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20151223094656.8074649b54c489dc3c24cabd@gmail.com> (geda-user AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (gEDA symbols indexing, User --> Category) References: <5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com> <20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151222224539 DOT 824d0603398b862d574e1ab4 AT gmail DOT com> <20151222222341 DOT 8107 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151223094656 DOT 8074649b54c489dc3c24cabd AT gmail DOT com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > As is now symbols at gedasymbols are avaialable per contributor > basis. It would be a lot easier to find suitable symbols they where > available per category basis with a note who contributed it. They > could of course be available in both directions. It's a lot easier to do access control if it's set up as one directory per user. Plus, I prefer to keep things in per-user areas for copyright reasons. Grouping the available data in other ways is the job of a script or CGI :-)