X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20151210011215.14229.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:12:15 +0100 From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gsch2pcb after refdes-renum? (If implemented syncronization detail) Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20151208205451 DOT bb2478f8722e1a885822689d AT gmail DOT com> <201512082019 DOT tB8KJOlP030874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151208222204 DOT 6566ebed300ca2683dd71bc8 AT gmail DOT com> <201512082139 DOT tB8LdLuL005789 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151208230637 DOT b8eb6c22230d5a3b977c3ca1 AT gmail DOT com> <201512082229 DOT tB8MTJBj010408 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <555EDA31-984C-4978-AE21-F74907CDC993 AT noqsi DOT com> <20151209220625 DOT ba29467498daecf1bf7b2244 AT gmail DOT com> <201512092109 DOT tB9L9p8o022465 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201512092109.tB9L9p8o022465@envy.delorie.com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk DJ Delorie wrote: > Forward annotation of every other attribute works just fine. It's > changing the refdes that's a problem, because gaf treats the refdes > specially. Is there still a problem if the cyclic U1->U2->U3->U1 rename is guaranteed to be atomic? As in, it's not three rename operations, but a single rename operation with three affected elements? //Peter