X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 76.173.13.15
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_93DA0FFC-20BC-471F-B785-71AA5D6B3BD7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gsch2pcb after refdes-renum? (If implemented syncronization detail)
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20151208190226.GA13862@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:22:47 -1000
Message-Id: <BF80ECE4-72D2-4FB6-9F97-B70CDA1A0B61@noqsi.com>
References: <56658683 DOT 401 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <CALT8Ef4=tMf=WmjYmp-2B3rN0SBmoqF5RkCoWZEm=+2hTBTENA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151207153821 DOT c2ac19e6f24b1776a3595e4a AT gmail DOT com> <CD4C755E-8E00-427D-909C-3F762A038844 AT gmail DOT com> <20151208091411 DOT c8968b0bedb705765529176c AT gmail DOT com> <B2F4DA99-3254-4C97-A408-854445A09C21 AT noqsi DOT com> <20151208190226 DOT GA13862 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_93DA0FFC-20BC-471F-B785-71AA5D6B3BD7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via =
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 07:26:29AM -1000, John Doty wrote:
>>=20
>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 10:14 PM, Nicklas Karlsson =
(nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] =
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> To put a serial number on each symbol would work but change file =
format.
>>=20
>> Nope. Just an attribute, but:
>>=20
>> We=92ve discussed this many times, and the problem is the =
unrestricted
>> semantics of symbol instance copying. A program that put the =
necessary
>> restrictions in place would no longer be gschem, and I expect it =
would
>> be far less usable.
>=20
> It would be just geda-gaf extension/module for using with pcb. If we'd
> add checks for unique refdes or unique refdes-slot pairs to such a
> module (like you've done in your new scripts for gnetlist), there =
would
> be no need to argue it every time.

Yes, that=92s the right way to do it. But no, it=92s won=92t stop the =
arguments. Those who like pcb=92s design (all shortcuts, no foundation) =
will always seek to push the same approach into geda-gaf.

>=20
> Cheers,
>  Vladimir
>=20

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_93DA0FFC-20BC-471F-B785-71AA5D6B3BD7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=fuTj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_93DA0FFC-20BC-471F-B785-71AA5D6B3BD7--