X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:12:06 -0500
Message-Id: <201512081912.tB8JC6Mb026336@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <41B9CE53-BEB6-4982-BD0B-A4C024449FD6@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:05:07 -1000)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gsch2pcb after refdes-renum? (If implemented syncronization detail)
References: <56658683 DOT 401 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <CALT8Ef4=tMf=WmjYmp-2B3rN0SBmoqF5RkCoWZEm=+2hTBTENA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151207153821 DOT c2ac19e6f24b1776a3595e4a AT gmail DOT com> <CD4C755E-8E00-427D-909C-3F762A038844 AT gmail DOT com> <20151208091411 DOT c8968b0bedb705765529176c AT gmail DOT com> <B2F4DA99-3254-4C97-A408-854445A09C21 AT noqsi DOT com> <201512081819 DOT tB8IJBrt022764 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <41B9CE53-BEB6-4982-BD0B-A4C024449FD6 AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Part of software development discipline is saying *no* to desires
> when the unintended consequences of their implementation will cause
> serious trouble.

And another part is seeing if someone else has already solved the
problem, so that there aren't any unintended consequenses and no
serious trouble.  Which is why I asked.  I'd rather help users solve
their problems than put blinders on and ignore them, if there's a
solution available.