X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=80L1BGsj8nLX2z2yMFbcQsEVG64Anps03/2Sa4UGyKI=; b=lQ8sUc8n/yuvOMYkWA56Bll71rfQxYG/bFszLu7CrH2wzyEPqQCCjWM4RsyftUU8yt 6yzeE56e2cFAJpGxMoCoG5Y3UlHdMi6hX8PeoFa/f/n3y3wVRWJb2OBFLDUU2PT19v8z fBlL1bNoEUU0lDyd7TG+H2t2Uj/4mjsRVkc9//h5TzOjseFLrdtQJ4YJ9IOeEKk3lA2p ndalX4c6ZULP4zHmtueMZqQSVhag76SvB4KGalCSMg/kJSW6XenhVIu0aFGO7MWZaTKs 873W8Df7/96eZJYR8WncWLq13rYvNSQVeG/20lGgTTiQISxyW7EjQPCJwmadLy8TuyRG P+1g== X-Received: by 10.28.220.69 with SMTP id t66mr17667239wmg.4.1449452512726; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 17:41:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:41:47 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gshem, pcb, arrow movement Message-Id: <20151207024147.e789a9fab31fe0d1feb44340@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20151206214133 DOT fc8779343f62baa3835fb2e3 AT gmail DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > Arrow keys may be used for movement and in gschem "background" is moved > > while in pcb pointer is moved. It would be good if both used same keys. > > movement of "background" in gschem with arrows is useful but arrow to move > > pointer for fine tuning in pcb is quite a lot more useful. > > > > Then I use them earlier today I thought it might be worth a try to combine > > them so that background is moved and pointer is moved relative to > > background although it stay at same point on screen. > > > > The two should ship with the same mouse and key movement system. There's > no reason to have them work differently by default, and it takes a long > time to get used to switching between them. The existing behavior must > still be available as an option of course. > > I also think pcb system is a bit better than gschem, but there's also the > question of which is more typical of other similar interfaces. I don't > know what the default behavior should be exactly, but it should be > consistent. > > Britton They are very similar. In gschem symbol could not be moved by arrows. In pcb display does not move. Nicklas Karlsson