X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=lxxmXoEGebfN2Li2AFt9ZsjhO3aluaC9VcIZfWbNxtI=;
        b=EYSekwQKEvNMbUQYQFjti0tWOd8d83fe4yjvHc/h4BgjxygmeiuTpL6E8nhmIiWrmF
         IBhiRz/uiZ/O9Yoip3dQSbwE32AqV9BoQ4fXbH4rm3DmUzkiXoPxpZCuUwIWoE81ZoIJ
         UmrJz2cudk2c+QkgpblymiKBpRBfFThvL6F1EyzUK+e/slglqKJIumrCMd3Ey/qkjlye
         89Cew7XMqfmNw0IjlXYGGoV2Eoz4LYAtWtaJ/lqanDtzmpdCoCKUs9/m82Z/NOOb/AEF
         PwDbgRy+lgr6JyKEinmOT+gqz3hDtguF7EaNi98plZeYZke7Wffwd8BfYDkxu6V2YGYZ
         CzNg==
X-Received: by 10.28.16.133 with SMTP id 127mr40261749wmq.24.1449007071310;
        Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 22:57:46 +0100
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB: clearouts in polygons slightly off, fix? Also
 clearance
Message-Id: <20151201225746.fcc0522449349d1aafff76c6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151201195038.GB2293@abax>
References: <20151201124843 DOT GC24702 AT abax>
	<20151201141203 DOT 8718b21c9e3e9b37d0b07472 AT gmail DOT com>
	<20151201195038 DOT GB2293 AT abax>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > It might be related, I found clearance is correct then using default
> > values but then clearance is changed it is wrong. I do not remeber the
> > details right now. I have been busy using gEDA for weeks and did not
> > yet have time to spend any time looking at code.
> 
> I can check while looking into the code. Can you provide at least some
> hint what kind of wrong clearance it was?

Yes I remember clearance was not correctly drawn then using auto enforce DRC clearance. I reported a bug but had and still do not have time to look at it.

It is a real problem then drawing traces with controlled impedance since distance will be wrong. It also a real problem then clearance is needed for safety and it might be worth putting an extra warning about manually checking the clearance because we will not get into trouble for something provided for free.


Regards Nicklas Karlsson