X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=MOt4hGpX7QdHeKdMOA1H541o4KE/vexdji3+iKYB3lU=;
        b=NZIqLcwAp8NN9OODnREOpkX7SY+PLWQr20N7uzMN+u2il4RZx/S/nxkPXAgFukJanq
         ZkJt50/U8jkVorodYQ6uKGytkqtrO7DzOs0BqEqvkaOpFzmN5KA5xQGsiAGkuuq32nS7
         EqwwHAdHmcYtT29+IVa0X6K4md37q8zdaQ5VBqTezlWQlCxopalVHsMXFqmk2PQs0NM2
         jtT8trEDe5CR5gmctlWYPzGljOO4dteiTpPzbnmccKnIdehEOx23tVZThY4embN4HTgk
         ARLcyX7dvnLrCrzKJKJQ2AAz2sNRHCENSEHfd5fOUHw/YS//RJqeiiSclH+A1qyNHUYE
         4/XQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.153.137 with SMTP id b131mr18408814wme.3.1447083258085;
 Mon, 09 Nov 2015 07:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:34:17 +0500
Message-ID: <CABuVarJsRmPwqdzekNYwQzoNWrrQ3pyq4rPhrB=ww=D2_UV-SA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [geda-user] Pin: what is the difference between normal pin and bus pin?
From: "Sergey Stepanov (no DOT such DOT process AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Looking through the documentation, I found that there is one feature
of pin, named pintype:

> The pintype is an enumerated type:
> NORMAL PIN = 0
> BUS PIN = 1 unused

In all symbols in the gEDA distribution, and also in gedasymbols.org
cvs, the pintype attribute set to 0, and 1 (BUS_PIN) is not used at
all (as stated in documentation).

I looked through the git history, but this did not make things
clearer: there's no clear description, what is it for. It remains
unused since its introduction in 2002.

Is there any purpose (current or future) for such pins? The only
difference I've found is that the bus pin is a bit thicker (and, of
course, there is some actions in code dealing with it).