X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mqtlJmSGcn4hWBSAmPufGKXeRk1XU1A02KtdZ6kHMTM=; b=w4RMlleOUhyygPMlmA2QhvP7qfSE4SduzQqmWwp2zyq1lnqy5YWyaLyDmotwwZRQUV koh+c9LUyG6Wmb84NtdsslmAs0cVoqVyLzJ+2k7aYnT7mMhfLOWQl/otcMgxTAJgGkO6 VmAJHrskUty3BhJgME6Hc7gnzCxjqQEHODUuR0ecJv1u9Ym8DViTMn/ZTOWyKOvAROs3 gknTY7Z4BsXbR0K11eLqloWMTiBIa9ZbOd+nsMD3kiDpAoyqz00h9ckD6948BIqDcxIZ wd1x0pv3P1hlR0o+SvA6X9W5Iuz8R+BgOXPUWyZq8TiCsdsPaZhopZpV5IOaVkMusiEd gQyw== X-Received: by 10.194.78.77 with SMTP id z13mr7344628wjw.145.1445632079604; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:27:54 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile Message-Id: <20151023222754.97316fe7329ae34417090953@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201510221953.t9MJr3Hp013618@envy.delorie.com> References: <201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510220149 DOT t9M1nrIe016145 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151022023002 DOT GA25952 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <201510221643 DOT t9MGhFfg003310 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151022170259 DOT GA28154 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <20151022213200 DOT c3f45fb3723dbcef555df7b9 AT gmail DOT com> <201510221953 DOT t9MJr3Hp013618 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > There should be exactly one short at the star ground point. If > > algorithm calculate their lines meet at the edge end point have to > > checked in some way. > > Or if a particular bit of copper could be tagged as "star point" or > something, the algorithm could know that it should be the edge of > multiple nets, and verify it. > > I'm just thinking, our DRC isn't designed to handle these types of > problems, but a new DRC might, and give us other benefits too. To be perfect: Short circuit between nets connected to this star point should be ignored but ordinary connection test should also work.