X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qfvzM+w4v1/8hbK9RgqwaEiyEMS1w1IdUJN2akYe3Jg=; b=xREFmPju6RS2TGtwQ4eHFAiizhUjXn7OiG3SRtbTA6Nk+1FH/ooAFMinVi0dgjwTCh n51tcEyk7JoBvic6XEcK09fKqQVYPZKMfYeTPmdM/DA1yCQrbyW2V2ba+nW5Zd3rFMkZ KghuJ8ygWPEP8sHMl7wzbNgVelymEwacU0Wa3PVa+auUWd8/6TanR7l+VTmE6QIR1c+o MDiDfLnsFshUKevtxp7h2nwiGDU8bQoAOidv8CuqlNYq4eeSuEZtDrj+qmUX+yB5p7uR QdhNkk0w/RlaWpK97rWS/TIEiI4jbingiS9BLKE2mIam8ajri81QNCTJleXV2+tVBpSS 2DZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.151.131 with SMTP id z125mr5693589lfd.104.1445518851528; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:00:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151022090310.d3dc512da6760471f9777706@gmail.com> References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <201510210954 DOT 46552 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <73ED29DA-968B-4675-9B00-125E03683C9B AT noqsi DOT com> <201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151022090310 DOT d3dc512da6760471f9777706 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:00:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:36 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: >> > >> >> Would you really do it that way or would you have two different nets >> >> that meet in a specific way? >> > >> > It's amazing how "obvious" it is to just put in an AGND and a DGND >> > symbol and connect them together... >> >> I can't tell if you like this idea or are mocking it. Disadvantage of email. >> Ether way mixing the two netnames one schematic would enable a lot of >> ambiguity about where the two meet. Typically when I two grounds and >> they are connected it is in a very controlled way. > > Symbolically it could be deon with an n pin zero ohm resistor or other symbol. In layout a special footprint with one connection point could do the trick. That is visually misleading. It should just be lines meeting at a dot. > Nicklas Karlsson -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/