X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Cge6EiCvmyQlRKObRUJlsJJFLsbUMPOaJWuzd6vrXJ0=; b=HRIZr38J1BAOa3aClTQrqqtbwW3uJzs04BfvbmAxowlJJNXkKfrZNjgOJSG6IoDZXE SUB+6HoC4rYcV+04DuojIX3/RPnzS1mQ0zmoZHKguL1DRTZ5wRip8qR3PSMcdouwEIlz Rs6h8TeXaNu9b6FbfrG9C8FMtRdRMDgVjF/oPeOen4CPGxQIX3Bnhc63Mb2ctTIyZryL /NeMuJ4O3lICFEuCFsE6AoDzv7HrqBNlBzE14ftKdRly8KwQ3WENVJ+Tjs4jRE/JciGI 3i9dAoeRAKD2ormFVc/Bi0lJjZv1FxZVNlJpOe6O84VtTG9RrXQR3nmwMScjq4R0oruE VrCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.130.195 with SMTP id og3mr7053219lbb.69.1445478262139; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:44:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201510220136.t9M1a5Uw015222@envy.delorie.com> References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <201510210954 DOT 46552 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <73ED29DA-968B-4675-9B00-125E03683C9B AT noqsi DOT com> <201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 01:44:22 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:36 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Would you really do it that way or would you have two different nets >> that meet in a specific way? > > It's amazing how "obvious" it is to just put in an AGND and a DGND > symbol and connect them together... I can't tell if you like this idea or are mocking it. Disadvantage of email. Ether way mixing the two netnames one schematic would enable a lot of ambiguity about where the two meet. Typically when I two grounds and they are connected it is in a very controlled way. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/