X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=JUOAL8wT01J9IkE+2jJcTXLAGPOwjUcVEkOerbn8qN4=;
        b=M3NkDoiuOkldyqnCZGxkcv2gijCiinp6ic+S5kMqDaUlNlbFH9KOizkW36j3VoyxNy
         X1wapftgyG15ol9s6GI67tL8znrwh24g6ry8/4nrvov4skfnwjJdCH6nCY6gStcjxsYb
         PP+nBcek176+qPjllV2GRtvdSpd3lZ8jcK2S+weRFG76Z+dbgKmSBDpOALHKGX0PdgEq
         gfuH1nLkW5XCQ2Z6jwD+DxLiuqZjafwttj3s9cjrKHBtb42DhSCL/6A8b9QpfC9HmDs2
         Biv+i0KJncIxDVOWfFs1jA4Cn45u8k8DMaS9WqV9+VKOWt5GF8z4m+u795fV9LKZ0ofw
         MKjA==
X-Received: by 10.112.134.197 with SMTP id pm5mr4656200lbb.3.1445422434222;
        Wed, 21 Oct 2015 03:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:13:48 +0200
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [geda-user] Reduce pinnumber attribute
Message-Id: <20151021121348.f3d3f466d0761fbd551f82ce@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

I assume pinnumber attribute is used to uniquely identify a pin.

For almost all if not all cases I guess the pinlabel could be used as symbol pin number. If netlister use pinlabel attribute if no pinnumber attribute is available number of attributes could be reduced.

Are there any disadvantages?



Nicklas Karlsson