X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:19:14 -0400 Message-Id: <201510192319.t9JNJEc5018334@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <64561ADF-EAC3-4729-9194-6FF1ED6792CD@noqsi.com> (message from John Doty on Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:00:11 -0600) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Pin mapping (separate symbols from mappings) References: <20151018204010 DOT 9cce6a231dcc296256e187bd AT gmail DOT com> <201510181843 DOT t9IIhmWo025346 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151018233004 DOT 78db1f9df1b1e68325c8639e AT gmail DOT com> <201510192118 DOT t9JLIHQv008013 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <64561ADF-EAC3-4729-9194-6FF1ED6792CD AT noqsi DOT com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Indeed that is. But this isn't: > > >> The package may include footprints > >> viable for this component. Alternatively the package may refer to a > >> footprint library by giving filenames of a footprints known to work. I read this as "the netlister chooses a footprint= from the list of alternatives in the package". If the data included in the "package" happens to be more than what geda-gaf uses, that's no different than including it in a symbol attribute that the rest of geda-gaf ignores.